jena-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andy Seaborne <andy.seabo...@epimorphics.com>
Subject Re: Hoping for smaller turtle(s)
Date Sun, 26 Dec 2010 18:47:48 GMT
Write to a gzip'ed stream?

	Andy

On 26/12/10 18:36, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Note that the goal here is to persuade the Turtle writer to make small
> Turtles from a model.
>
> On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Andy Seaborne<andy.seaborne@gmail.com>  wrote:
>> Ian's correct - the local part can't start with a digit. It's part of the
>> turtle space.
>>
>> In terms of writing Turtle by hand:
>>
>> @base<uri:jug:001f469cc17412da1ce53fa1f9b67481>  .
>>
>> <#12>
>>       a       rex:Organization ;
>>       ...
>>
>> works but the writer isn't clever enough to use a base in the file (@base
>> does not survive parsing).  If you write it with that base, it might work.
>>
>>
>> In design terms, it's a completely unnessary restriction.  It's not a XML
>> QNAME or related to it any more.
>>
>> Long version:
>> http://seaborne.blogspot.com/2010/06/standardising-rdf-syntaxes.html
>>
>> SPARQL does not have this restriction because the last working group got
>> pushback not to follow Turtle exactly here, especially from communities
>> using URNs generated from existing systems ....
>>
>> Hopefully, the next RDF WG will do the right thing.
>>
>>         Andy
>>
>> On 26/12/10 18:08, Ian Dickinson wrote:
>>>
>>> I should have added:
>>>
>>>> blob:12
>>>> probably won't parse as you expect
>>>
>>> and therefore the writer is smart enough not to generate it.
>>>
>>> Ian
>>

Mime
View raw message