james-site-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Danny Angus" <da...@apache.org>
Subject RE: James release version download link confusion...
Date Sat, 18 Oct 2003 20:01:35 GMT
ok :-)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:noel@devtech.com]
> Sent: 17 October 2003 17:23
> To: site-dev@james.apache.org
> Cc: Ray
> Subject: RE: James release version download link confusion...
>
>
> Danny,
>
> Neither Serge nor I have karma for jakarta-site2 module (although that can
> be fixed ;-)).   Would you please commit and apply the attached?
>
> I'll look at setting up our own download page(s).
>
> 	--- Noel
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ray [mailto:ray.barlow@makeyour-point.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 11:04
> To: noel@devtech.com
> Subject: James release version download link confusion...
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Don't worry I'm not looking to asks questions and I'm sorry not
> to post this
> to a mailing list. I can't post to the list without subscribing
> (understandably) but its hard enough keeping up with the ones I work with,
> without adding more that I don't really need. You can forward it to the
> mailing list or others appropriate if you think it warrants it or
> you don't
> have control over this area.
>
> The http://james.apache.org/#releases page clearly states 2.1.3 as the
> latest stable and "All users are urged to upgrade to v2.1.3 as soon as
> possible." but unfortunately when you follow the link to the download area
> http://jakarta.apache.org/site/binindex.cgi it provides a link to
> 2.1 as the
> latest release version! If you follow further down you can access the
> "special archive area" where I found the latest release I wanted
> http://archive.apache.org/dist/jakarta/james/. I got luscious because I've
> been running 2.1.2 and thought it a bit funny when downloading
> the file and
> the onscreen version number reported as 2.1, then I checked the date/time
> stamp of the manifest file and it is Dec 2002 inline with your
> 2.1 release.
>
> Anyway hope it helps and sorry to bother you if I'm talking rubbish.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ray
>


Mime
View raw message