james-site-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Danny Angus" <da...@apache.org>
Subject RE: James release version download link confusion...
Date Sat, 18 Oct 2003 22:29:47 GMT
Done

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Danny Angus [mailto:danny@apache.org]
> Sent: 18 October 2003 21:02
> To: site-dev@james.apache.org
> Subject: RE: James release version download link confusion...
> 
> 
> ok :-)
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:noel@devtech.com]
> > Sent: 17 October 2003 17:23
> > To: site-dev@james.apache.org
> > Cc: Ray
> > Subject: RE: James release version download link confusion...
> >
> >
> > Danny,
> >
> > Neither Serge nor I have karma for jakarta-site2 module 
> (although that can
> > be fixed ;-)).   Would you please commit and apply the attached?
> >
> > I'll look at setting up our own download page(s).
> >
> > 	--- Noel
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ray [mailto:ray.barlow@makeyour-point.com]
> > Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 11:04
> > To: noel@devtech.com
> > Subject: James release version download link confusion...
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Don't worry I'm not looking to asks questions and I'm sorry not
> > to post this
> > to a mailing list. I can't post to the list without subscribing
> > (understandably) but its hard enough keeping up with the ones I 
> work with,
> > without adding more that I don't really need. You can forward it to the
> > mailing list or others appropriate if you think it warrants it or
> > you don't
> > have control over this area.
> >
> > The http://james.apache.org/#releases page clearly states 2.1.3 as the
> > latest stable and "All users are urged to upgrade to v2.1.3 as soon as
> > possible." but unfortunately when you follow the link to the 
> download area
> > http://jakarta.apache.org/site/binindex.cgi it provides a link to
> > 2.1 as the
> > latest release version! If you follow further down you can access the
> > "special archive area" where I found the latest release I wanted
> > http://archive.apache.org/dist/jakarta/james/. I got luscious 
> because I've
> > been running 2.1.2 and thought it a bit funny when downloading
> > the file and
> > the onscreen version number reported as 2.1, then I checked the 
> date/time
> > stamp of the manifest file and it is Dec 2002 inline with your
> > 2.1 release.
> >
> > Anyway hope it helps and sorry to bother you if I'm talking rubbish.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Ray
> >
> 

Mime
View raw message