james-server-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Eric Charles <e...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Mixing ver 2.x and 3.x
Date Tue, 29 Jan 2013 15:57:01 GMT


On 29/01/2013 15:52, Jerry M wrote:
> I have a production systemthat's been running 2.x forever.  Pretty much
> stable with no real problems. I don't have the time, nor do I want to
> take the risk at this point to even think about doing a complete
> conversion to 3.  And technically, it's still in beta, correct?  But I
> desperately need an IMAP server for a couple of situations.  So a few
> questions...
>
> 1) James 3.x does support IMAP, correct

Correct

>
> 2) Is James 3.x / IMAP stable enough to use, assuming I accept the
> typicalbeta-code risks?

It all depends on your requirements and user expectations.
If you read the mailing list, the biggest issues so far are related to 
thread (spool, remote delivery) not working at a certain time.

Just give it a try...

>
> 3) Would you foresee any issues if I install 3.x in the same box with my
> production 2.x assuming I attach 3.x to a completely different IP address?
>

You will have issues if both james use the same ports.

> Thanks.
>
> Jerry
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-user-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: server-user-help@james.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-user-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-user-help@james.apache.org


Mime
View raw message