Mailing-List: contact server-user-help@james.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "James Users List" <server-user@james.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of aaron@sendthisfile.com
 designates 108.168.136.194 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: "Aaron Freeman" <aaron@sendthisfile.com>
To: "'James Users List'" <server-user@james.apache.org>
References: <01b801cd5282$a66c3d70$f344b850$@sendthisfile.com>
 <021c01cd52fd$cb200810$61601830$@sendthisfile.com>
 <4FE97ABE.9010706@apache.org>
In-Reply-To: <4FE97ABE.9010706@apache.org>
Subject: RE: James 3.0 - beta 4 Date/Time Problem
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 13:40:10 -0500
Message-ID: <02dc01cd53cb$1dac25a0$590470e0$@sendthisfile.com>
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Thread-Index: AQHnO6dZG7jbuHeN8v0jAveJ8VGOTgJB6PE2AVhnBC6WvEv3wA==
Content-Language: en-us

We pulled down 3.0 beta 5 and rolled it in and tested ... timestamp now
working great! 

Thanks a ton!

Aaron


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric Charles [mailto:eric@apache.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 4:03 AM
> To: James Users List
> Subject: Re: James 3.0 - beta 4 Date/Time Problem
> 
> This is a bug which is fixed in trunk (see PROTOCOLS-96).
> 
> You should be able to test the fix with the latest snapshot to download
from
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/j
> ames/apache-james/3.0-beta5-SNAPSHOT/
> 
> (I hope this one will have my latest commit:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/j
> ames/apache-james/3.0-beta5-SNAPSHOT/apache-james-3.0-beta5-
> 20120625.114723-291-app.zip)
> 
> Thx, Eric
> 
> On 06/25/2012 08:10 PM, Aaron Freeman wrote:
> > Bah I was wrong -- both installs are reporting the time incorrectly
> > after
> > 1:00 PM.
> >
> > If anybody has any ideas, fire away?
> >
> > -a
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Aaron Freeman [mailto:aaron@sendthisfile.com]
> >> Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2012 10:29 PM
> >> To: server-user@james.apache.org
> >> Subject: James 3.0 - beta 4 Date/Time Problem
> >>
> >> I just sent an email to myself.  It was 21:22 (9:22 PM) when I sent
> >> it.  I received it immediately after sending it.
> >>
> >> The date in the Received header is incorrect, but the Date: header is
> > correct.
> >> So Outlook displays it incorrectly in its list of incoming email, but
> >> when
> > you
> >> view the email itself, it looks correct.
> >>
> >> I have noticed it doesn't EVER handle PM correctly -- so in the
> >> morning,
> > the
> >> emails work properly because it's AM, but in the evening all email
> >> still
> > gets
> >> listed as AM.
> >>
> >> I can think of two ways this might happen:
> >>
> >> 1) The Received: field is always missing the AM/PM.
> >>
> >> ... or ...
> >>
> >> 2) Whatever is created the Received header expects a 24 hour number
> >> and is always getting a 12 hour number with AM/PM and it's ignoring
> >> the PM (pure speculation on my part as to if that's what is
> >> happening, but that's a
> > good
> >> description of the problem).
> >>
> >> Here is an example of an email in error:
> >>
> >> Return-Path:<aaron@no-spam.com>
> >> Message-ID:<01b201cd5279$69425e10$3bc71a30$@no-spam.com>
> >> MIME-Version: 1.0
> >> X-MessageIsInfected: false
> >> Delivered-To: aaron@no-spam.com
> >> Received: from computer.net (EHLO AaronPC) ([199.74.33.131])
> >>            by mail.no-spam.com (JAMES SMTP Server ) with ESMTP ID
> > 1431131469
> >>            for<aaron@no-spam.com>;
> >>            Sun, 24 Jun 2012 09:22:46 -0500 (CDT)
> >> From: "Aaron Nospam"<aaron@no-spam.com> To:<aaron@no-
> spam.com>
> >> Subject: test
> >> Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 21:22:47 -0500
> >> Content-Type: text/plain;
> >> 	charset="us-ascii"
> >> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> >> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
> >> Thread-Index: Ac1SeWfYz5vg0a4NSv6oCpmsEtzKLA==
> >> Content-Language: en-us
> >>
> >> Is there anywhere in the system or any options I could change to fix
this?
> >> What's weird is I believe we are running James 3.0 beta 4 on another
> >> box
> > and
> >> we don't have this problem on that one -- I'll need to verify it's
> >> beta 4
> > and not
> >> beta 3 to be sure though.
> >>
> >> Thoughts?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Aaron
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-user-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: server-user-help@james.apache.org
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-user-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: server-user-help@james.apache.org
> >
> 
> --
> eric | http://about.echarles.net | @echarles
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-user-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: server-user-help@james.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-user-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-user-help@james.apache.org