Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-james-user-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 12027 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2003 06:07:49 -0000 Received: from exchange.sun.com (192.18.33.10) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Mar 2003 06:07:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 25327 invoked by uid 97); 2 Mar 2003 06:09:37 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-james-user@nagoya.betaversion.org Received: (qmail 25320 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2003 06:09:37 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by nagoya.betaversion.org with SMTP; 2 Mar 2003 06:09:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 11835 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2003 06:07:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact james-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "James Users List" Reply-To: "James Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list james-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 11822 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2003 06:07:47 -0000 Received: from dsl081-102-201.den1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO karma) (64.81.102.201) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Mar 2003 06:07:47 -0000 Received: from 192.168.0.21 ([192.168.0.21]) by karma (JAMES SMTP Server 2.1.2) with SMTP ID 201 for ; Sun, 2 Mar 2003 06:06:58 +0000 (GMT+00:00) Message-ID: <3E619F95.4080502@speakeasy.org> Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2003 23:07:17 -0700 From: Eric Weidner User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.3b) Gecko/20030210 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: James Users List Subject: Re: Server VM Crash with James References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Noel, This is the default kernel on the released 1.4.1 (not _01 or release candidate). I also had problems running James on Windows with 1.4.1 with the server VM. I'm usually very quick to upgrade JVM's, but I was a little behind on this box. Just thought a little FYI was in order for people in the same position. Eric Noel J. Bergman wrote: >Eric, > >You appear to be running JDK 1.4.1 not 1.4.1_01, correct? Is it a released >version of 1.4.1 or a release candidate? > >Mine: Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM (build 1.4.1_01-b01, mixed mode) >Yours: Java VM: Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM (1.4.1-rc-b19 mixed mode) > >I'll update to 1.4.1_02 at the next cycle, but I've had absolutely no >problems with JDK 1.4.1_01 with updated kernels (RH 2.2.22-6.2.2 and RH >2.4.18-24.8.0). > >My recollection is that people who had previously reported problems >with -server reported that it was working fine after they updated their JVM. > > --- Noel > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: james-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org >For additional commands, e-mail: james-user-help@jakarta.apache.org > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: james-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: james-user-help@jakarta.apache.org