james-server-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Norman Maurer <nor...@apache.org>
Subject Re: avalon-spring-library (Was: [jira] Commented: (JAMES-842) Inconsistencies in spring integration)
Date Thu, 03 Jul 2008 12:44:29 GMT
Am Donnerstag, den 03.07.2008, 13:27 +0100 schrieb Robert Burrell
Donkin:
> On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 9:59 AM, Stefano Bagnara <apache@bago.org> wrote:
> > Bernd Fondermann ha scritto:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 10:57 AM, Stefano Bagnara <apache@bago.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Bernd Fondermann (JIRA) ha scritto:
> >>>>
> >>>>   [
> >>>>
> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-842?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12609623#action_12609623
> >>>> ]
> >>>> Bernd Fondermann commented on JAMES-842:
> >>>> ----------------------------------------
> >>>>
> >>>> Great work, Stefano! Thanks for taking care (also for 841 & 840).
> >>>
> >>> Thank you :-)
> >>>
> >>> Should we move the "non-james-specific" spring-avalon bridge to an
> >>> "avalon-spring-library" and just keep the FileSystemBridge+configurations
> >>> in
> >>> the spring-deployment module?
> >>
> >> I see the motivation for this and think its very worthwhile from an
> >> architectural POV.
> >
> > I just realized that I didn't explain well what I meant.
> >
> > I was proposing only to create a james server submodule (like the
> > core-library module) to host the non-james-specific code. This way the code
> > would be part of the main james tree (we would have 1 more module, of
> > course) but it would be cleaner what is the bridge and would be easier to
> > allow people to just get the bridge and build it (with m2 is already
> > possible to build a module without the whole project checked out).
> >
> >> And I'd support it, if I'd have the time for it. But I haven't. :-/
> >> Maybe people from springframework.org want to adopt it and develop it
> >> independent from James.
> >
> > *IF* people will have interests in that code or we find that we need to
> > release it indipendently then (and only then) we could move it outside from
> > the james tree (as its own james product or in excalibur, or in
> > springframework..).
> >
> > And if people agree it is a positive change I would offer myself for the
> > task (not a big issue, if I don't miss something).
> 
> sounds like a good change to me
> 
> - robert

go, Stefano go ;-)

bye
Norman


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org


Mime
View raw message