Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-james-server-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 49872 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2004 23:40:55 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Feb 2004 23:40:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 32403 invoked by uid 500); 5 Feb 2004 23:40:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-james-server-dev-archive@james.apache.org Received: (qmail 32369 invoked by uid 500); 5 Feb 2004 23:40:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact server-dev-help@james.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "James Developers List" Reply-To: "James Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list server-dev@james.apache.org Received: (qmail 32258 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2004 23:40:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.rosebrock.org) (203.31.212.12) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Feb 2004 23:40:25 -0000 Received: from [10.0.0.6] ([203.113.245.188]) by rosebrock.org ( IA Mail Server Version: 3.2.4. Build: 1100 ) ) ; Fri, 06 Feb 2004 10:51:52 +1100 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v612) In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Uwe Rosebrock Subject: Re: aliases Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 10:41:54 +1100 To: "James Developers List" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.612) X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi guys, > >> If you really want to use it I will do it once I finished my current >> project. > > I wondered how this ties into James' users, if there is a maping > between > users and addresses would it not be better to (eventually) include > this in > the account details, rather than an external mapping.. Danny, one table reflects the user account, so the User - lookup is directed to there too.. > > If what you have works without altering James User functionality, and > gets > there using dynamic mapping of aliases then thats just fine (because > it is > self contained), but not a whole solution. > IMHO a whole solution would have to have integrated (integrated with > James' > User repositories) support for multiple mail domains each having > distinct > user namespace. That's right, that is what you get now with a more restrictive policy on what domain can be assigned to what user name. > > (I've tested a solution which uses POP binding to IP addresses to > decide > which domains set of users to log you onto, > and as a "named vhost" alternative the use of full addresses as > usernames > to determine which domain to use. I had a hdd head crash and lost it, > but > to my mind any "complete" vhost solution would have to have unique user > account namespaces for each mail domain. As POP3 makes it hard to > identify > what domain you think you are logging into the awkwardness arises > there, > and not with the internal handling of account names and mail routing) see above, this becomes a management issue more than anything else, the concept will prevail- map user account to aliases@domain. Noel, Serge fair enough, that just means to me that these parts of the code in particular are still under heavy development (beyond state that to which they always are - which I didn't they are...). The comment I made was out of frustration to want to overwrite a public method and having to replace the entire class. Uwe --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org