Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-james-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 1383 invoked from network); 24 Jan 2003 09:53:20 -0000 Received: from exchange.sun.com (192.18.33.10) by 208.185.179.12.available.above.net with SMTP; 24 Jan 2003 09:53:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 5035 invoked by uid 97); 24 Jan 2003 09:54:54 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-james-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 4997 invoked by uid 97); 24 Jan 2003 09:54:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact james-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "James Developers List" Reply-To: "James Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list james-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 4975 invoked by uid 98); 24 Jan 2003 09:54:53 -0000 X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4218 created Aug 14 2002) Message-ID: <3E310D17.3040902@xtra.co.nz> Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 22:53:27 +1300 From: Aaron Knauf User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20021003 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: James Developers List Subject: Re: CVS modules policy? References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: 208.185.179.12.available.above.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: 208.185.179.12.available.above.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N Or both? We can make james-site map to james/site with an entry in the modules file. ADK Danny Angus wrote: >Hi, > >We're just starting to discuss re-organising James cvs. > >Is there a policy about module layout, in other words if we want to break James cvs into seperate modules should we be looking at new modules named james-server, james-mailet, james-site or james/server, james/mailet, james/site? > > >-- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: >For additional commands, e-mail: > > > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: