james-mime4j-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Norman Maurer <norman.mau...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: As far as I am concerned 0.7 is ready
Date Tue, 19 Jul 2011 07:38:47 GMT
Ok let us target it for 0.8 then. I will get the release process
rolling later this evening...

Bye,
Norman


2011/7/18 Stefano Bagnara <apache@bago.org>:
> 2011/7/18 Oleg Kalnichevski <olegk@apache.org>:
>> On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 21:48 +0200, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
>>> 2011/7/18 Norman Maurer <norman.maurer@googlemail.com>:
>>> > Hi there,
>>> >
>>> > just to be more clear. I'm not very strong with it, so if others
>>> > prefer we can just release it like it is...
>>>
>>> I leave this to you and Oleg. Either way it is not an elegant solution
>>> and we'll need to fix that part of the api (configuration + advanced
>>> features) in future releases (IMO).
>>>
>>> Stefano
>>>
>>
>> Sorry for being blunt but MessageServiceFactory / ServiceLocator stuff
>> was not of my making. I had nothing to do with it and have nothing to
>> contribute there.
>
> What we have now is the result of what I did in a first place and how
> you changed it to make it pass your review.
>
> You wanted to remove the abstract classes in favor of interfaces for
> parser/builders and wanted to remove that methods I added (e.g:
> setDecodeMonitor was a method of the public api abstract class), so
> you can't say "I had nothing to do with it", now ;-)
>
> As I said I'm fine with a 0.7 release from the current trunk, but this
> doesn't mean that dom is complete and stable: as we call it 0.x I
> don't see issues with this plan and there is no need to delay the
> release more.
>
> Stefano
>

Mime
View raw message