james-mime4j-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Oleg Kalnichevski <ol...@apache.org>
Subject Re: As far as I am concerned 0.7 is ready
Date Tue, 19 Jul 2011 08:29:45 GMT
On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 22:18 +0200, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
> 2011/7/18 Oleg Kalnichevski <olegk@apache.org>:
> > On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 21:48 +0200, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
> >> 2011/7/18 Norman Maurer <norman.maurer@googlemail.com>:
> >> > Hi there,
> >> >
> >> > just to be more clear. I'm not very strong with it, so if others
> >> > prefer we can just release it like it is...
> >>
> >> I leave this to you and Oleg. Either way it is not an elegant solution
> >> and we'll need to fix that part of the api (configuration + advanced
> >> features) in future releases (IMO).
> >>
> >> Stefano
> >>
> >
> > Sorry for being blunt but MessageServiceFactory / ServiceLocator stuff
> > was not of my making. I had nothing to do with it and have nothing to
> > contribute there.
> 
> What we have now is the result of what I did in a first place and how
> you changed it to make it pass your review.
> 
> You wanted to remove the abstract classes in favor of interfaces for
> parser/builders and wanted to remove that methods I added (e.g:
> setDecodeMonitor was a method of the public api abstract class), so
> you can't say "I had nothing to do with it", now ;-)
> 

Stefano

MessageServiceFactory is an abstract class, not an interface. So, I have
no idea what you are talking about. Feel free to add whatever methods to
that class you please.

Oleg 




Mime
View raw message