james-mime4j-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Oleg Kalnichevski (JIRA)" <mime4j-...@james.apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (MIME4J-193) Being able to write a message using dom api with no dependencies on the message package
Date Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:31:47 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-193?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13049815#comment-13049815
] 

Oleg Kalnichevski commented on MIME4J-193:
------------------------------------------

No one commented up to this point. So, my preference would be to close this issue as WONTFIX.
Feel free to reassign it to 0.8 though if you still would like this issue to be looked at
a later point.

Oleg

> Being able to write a message using dom api with no dependencies on the message package
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MIME4J-193
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-193
>             Project: JAMES Mime4j
>          Issue Type: Wish
>          Components: dom
>    Affects Versions: 0.7
>            Reporter: Stefano Bagnara
>             Fix For: 0.7
>
>
> While refactoring jDKIM against the latest mime4j trunk I found that the code now depends
on "message" package because of MimeWriter.DEFAULT.writeTo calls.
> At the same time I see we now have MessageServiceFactory.newMessageFormatter and MessageFormatter
interface that expose a writeTo(Message, OutputStream) method: why don't we expose all of
the other writeTo methods from MimeWriter, too? (and maybe MimeWriter should implement MessageFormatter
so we don't need the MessageFormatterImpl class at all)
> WDYT?

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Mime
View raw message