james-mime4j-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Norman Maurer <nor...@apache.org>
Subject Re: about mime4j 0.6.1 plan
Date Mon, 27 Dec 2010 16:22:40 GMT
Ok.. anything else you want to change before I prepare for the vote ?

Bye,
Norman


2010/12/27 Niklas Therning <niklas@trillian.se>:
> That would be great!
>
> On 12/27/2010 08:49 AM, Norman Maurer wrote:
>>
>> Yes, the maven release plugin will help...  Should I take care and act
>> as release manager ?
>>
>> Bye
>> Norman
>>
>>
>> Am Montag, 27. Dezember 2010 schrieb Niklas Therning<niklas@trillian.se>:
>>>
>>> Should we start a formal vote on this one?
>>>
>>> /Niklas
>>>
>>> On 12/17/2010 02:21 PM, Norman Maurer wrote:
>>>
>>> +1,
>>> Norman
>>>
>>>
>>> 2010/12/17 Niklas Therning<niklas@trillian.se>:
>>>
>>> I just committed the MIME4J-138 changes to the 0.6 bug fix branch.
>>>
>>> +1 from me on releasing 0.6.1 with only MIME4J-138 as changes.
>>>
>>> /Niklas
>>>
>>> On 12/17/2010 10:43 AM, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
>>>
>>> I just had a quick review of the issues fixed in 0.7 and I didn't find
>>> other issues (apart MIME4J-138) to be backported. Most of the other
>>> bugfix/improvements requires bigger refactorings and they are not
>>> critical as MIME4J-138.
>>>
>>> So maybe we should simply push 0.6.1 with only MIME4J-138 as changes.
>>> Is there anything else we should put in 0.6.1 before attempting a
>>> release?
>>>
>>> Stefano
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>

Mime
View raw message