james-mime4j-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Niklas Therning <nik...@trillian.se>
Subject Re: about mime4j 0.6.1 plan
Date Mon, 27 Dec 2010 06:50:50 GMT
Should we start a formal vote on this one?

/Niklas

On 12/17/2010 02:21 PM, Norman Maurer wrote:
> +1,
> Norman
>
>
> 2010/12/17 Niklas Therning<niklas@trillian.se>:
>> I just committed the MIME4J-138 changes to the 0.6 bug fix branch.
>>
>> +1 from me on releasing 0.6.1 with only MIME4J-138 as changes.
>>
>> /Niklas
>>
>> On 12/17/2010 10:43 AM, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
>>> I just had a quick review of the issues fixed in 0.7 and I didn't find
>>> other issues (apart MIME4J-138) to be backported. Most of the other
>>> bugfix/improvements requires bigger refactorings and they are not
>>> critical as MIME4J-138.
>>>
>>> So maybe we should simply push 0.6.1 with only MIME4J-138 as changes.
>>> Is there anything else we should put in 0.6.1 before attempting a
>>> release?
>>>
>>> Stefano
>>


Mime
View raw message