james-mime4j-dev mailing list archives: November 2009

Site index · List index
Message listThread · Author · Date
Andrzej Rusin (JIRA) [jira] Created: (MIME4J-139) DelegatingFieldParser NPE problem Tue, 03 Nov, 09:31
[jira] Commented: (MIME4J-139) DelegatingFieldParser NPE problem
Markus Wiederkehr (JIRA)   [jira] Commented: (MIME4J-139) DelegatingFieldParser NPE problem Tue, 03 Nov, 15:11
Oleg Kalnichevski (JIRA)   [jira] Commented: (MIME4J-139) DelegatingFieldParser NPE problem Tue, 03 Nov, 22:12
Markus Wiederkehr (JIRA)   [jira] Commented: (MIME4J-139) DelegatingFieldParser NPE problem Tue, 03 Nov, 23:06
Stefano Bagnara (JIRA)   [jira] Commented: (MIME4J-139) DelegatingFieldParser NPE problem Wed, 04 Nov, 00:06
Andrzej Rusin (JIRA)   [jira] Commented: (MIME4J-139) DelegatingFieldParser NPE problem Wed, 04 Nov, 07:03
Markus Wiederkehr (JIRA)   [jira] Commented: (MIME4J-139) DelegatingFieldParser NPE problem Sun, 15 Nov, 20:07
Apache Hudson Server Build failed in Hudson: mime4j-trunk #630 Sat, 07 Nov, 04:01
Apache Hudson Server   Hudson build is back to normal: mime4j-trunk #631 Sat, 07 Nov, 05:08
Kristian Rink using mime4j to work with IMAP messages? Mon, 09 Nov, 13:02
Norman Maurer   Re: using mime4j to work with IMAP messages? Mon, 09 Nov, 13:08
mike bell (JIRA) [jira] Created: (MIME4J-140) MIME4J-57 is not practical in its limits and incorrect in its RFC interpretation Sun, 15 Nov, 07:58
[jira] Commented: (MIME4J-140) MIME4J-57 is not practical in its limits and incorrect in its RFC interpretation
mike bell (JIRA)   [jira] Commented: (MIME4J-140) MIME4J-57 is not practical in its limits and incorrect in its RFC interpretation Sun, 15 Nov, 08:00
Oleg Kalnichevski (JIRA)   [jira] Commented: (MIME4J-140) MIME4J-57 is not practical in its limits and incorrect in its RFC interpretation Sun, 15 Nov, 14:58
Markus Wiederkehr (JIRA)   [jira] Commented: (MIME4J-140) MIME4J-57 is not practical in its limits and incorrect in its RFC interpretation Sun, 15 Nov, 18:43
Oleg Kalnichevski (JIRA)   [jira] Commented: (MIME4J-140) MIME4J-57 is not practical in its limits and incorrect in its RFC interpretation Sun, 15 Nov, 19:01
Markus Wiederkehr (JIRA)   [jira] Commented: (MIME4J-140) MIME4J-57 is not practical in its limits and incorrect in its RFC interpretation Sun, 15 Nov, 20:41
Markus Wiederkehr (JIRA)   [jira] Commented: (MIME4J-140) MIME4J-57 is not practical in its limits and incorrect in its RFC interpretation Sun, 15 Nov, 20:43
Oleg Kalnichevski (JIRA)   [jira] Commented: (MIME4J-140) MIME4J-57 is not practical in its limits and incorrect in its RFC interpretation Sun, 15 Nov, 22:27
Markus Wiederkehr (JIRA)   [jira] Commented: (MIME4J-140) MIME4J-57 is not practical in its limits and incorrect in its RFC interpretation Sun, 15 Nov, 22:45
Markus Wiederkehr (JIRA)   [jira] Commented: (MIME4J-140) MIME4J-57 is not practical in its limits and incorrect in its RFC interpretation Mon, 16 Nov, 11:29
Markus Wiederkehr (JIRA)   [jira] Commented: (MIME4J-140) MIME4J-57 is not practical in its limits and incorrect in its RFC interpretation Mon, 16 Nov, 13:29
Oleg Kalnichevski (JIRA)   [jira] Commented: (MIME4J-140) MIME4J-57 is not practical in its limits and incorrect in its RFC interpretation Tue, 17 Nov, 19:00
mwiederk...@apache.org svn commit: r836394 - in /james/mime4j/trunk: benchmark/ examples/ Sun, 15 Nov, 19:06
mwiederk...@apache.org svn commit: r836395 - /james/mime4j/trunk/assemble/ Sun, 15 Nov, 19:09
mwiederk...@apache.org svn commit: r836402 - /james/mime4j/trunk/core/src/main/java/org/apache/james/mime4j/field/DelegatingFieldParser.java Sun, 15 Nov, 20:14
mwiederk...@apache.org svn commit: r836403 - /james/mime4j/trunk/core/src/main/java/org/apache/james/mime4j/field/AbstractField.java Sun, 15 Nov, 20:15
Markus Wiederkehr (JIRA) [jira] Resolved: (MIME4J-139) DelegatingFieldParser NPE problem Sun, 15 Nov, 20:17
Apache Hudson Server Build failed in Hudson: mime4j-trunk #641 Mon, 16 Nov, 01:21
Apache Hudson Server   Build failed in Hudson: mime4j-trunk #642 Mon, 16 Nov, 02:29
Apache Hudson Server     Hudson build is back to normal: mime4j-trunk #643 Mon, 16 Nov, 05:35
mwiederk...@apache.org svn commit: r880687 - /james/mime4j/trunk/core/src/main/java/org/apache/james/mime4j/parser/MimeEntityConfig.java Mon, 16 Nov, 09:27
mwiederk...@apache.org svn commit: r880688 - /james/mime4j/trunk/core/src/main/java/org/apache/james/mime4j/parser/MimeEntityConfig.java Mon, 16 Nov, 09:31
mwiederk...@apache.org svn commit: r880692 - /james/mime4j/trunk/core/src/main/java/org/apache/james/mime4j/parser/MimeEntityConfig.java Mon, 16 Nov, 09:47
Markus Wiederkehr (JIRA) [jira] Assigned: (MIME4J-140) MIME4J-57 is not practical in its limits and incorrect in its RFC interpretation Mon, 16 Nov, 11:13
mwiederk...@apache.org svn commit: r880712 - in /james/mime4j/trunk/core/src: main/java/org/apache/james/mime4j/parser/AbstractEntity.java main/java/org/apache/james/mime4j/parser/MimeEntityConfig.java test/java/org/apache/james/mime4j/parser/MimeEntityTest.java Mon, 16 Nov, 11:25
mwiederk...@apache.org svn commit: r880728 - in /james/mime4j/trunk/core/src: main/java/org/apache/james/mime4j/io/MaxHeaderLengthLimitException.java main/java/org/apache/james/mime4j/parser/AbstractEntity.java test/java/org/apache/james/mime4j/parser/MimeEntityTest.java Mon, 16 Nov, 12:36
mwiederk...@apache.org svn commit: r880739 - /james/mime4j/trunk/core/src/main/java/org/apache/james/mime4j/parser/AbstractEntity.java Mon, 16 Nov, 13:22
Markus Wiederkehr Release 0.6.1? Mon, 16 Nov, 13:55
Norman Maurer   Re: Release 0.6.1? Mon, 16 Nov, 13:57
Oleg Kalnichevski   Re: Release 0.6.1? Tue, 17 Nov, 19:00
Norman Maurer     Re: Release 0.6.1? Wed, 18 Nov, 11:12
Re: SMTP Transport?
Oleg Kalnichevski   Re: SMTP Transport? Sun, 22 Nov, 23:31
Norman Maurer     Re: SMTP Transport? Mon, 23 Nov, 19:46
Oleg Kalnichevski Address list parser expects unfolded field body. Does that make sense? Fri, 27 Nov, 13:24
Oleg Kalnichevski   Re: Address list parser expects unfolded field body. Does that make sense? Fri, 27 Nov, 13:37
Markus Wiederkehr     Re: Address list parser expects unfolded field body. Does that make sense? Fri, 27 Nov, 18:58
Oleg Kalnichevski       Re: Address list parser expects unfolded field body. Does that make sense? Fri, 27 Nov, 21:21
Markus Wiederkehr         Re: Address list parser expects unfolded field body. Does that make sense? Fri, 27 Nov, 23:02
Oleg Kalnichevski           Re: Address list parser expects unfolded field body. Does that make sense? Fri, 27 Nov, 23:19
Markus Wiederkehr             Re: Address list parser expects unfolded field body. Does that make sense? Sun, 29 Nov, 19:22
Message listThread · Author · Date
Box list
Jun 20154
May 201521
Apr 20154
Dec 20143
Nov 20149
Oct 201413
Sep 20148
Aug 201421
Jul 20148
Jun 201435
May 20146
Mar 20145
Feb 20142
Jan 201426
Nov 20135
Sep 201314
Jul 201312
May 201335
Apr 201328
Mar 201334
Jan 20134
Dec 201222
Nov 20123
Oct 201213
Sep 201212
Aug 201213
Jul 20121
Jun 201217
May 201214
Apr 20121
Mar 201211
Feb 201225
Jan 201218
Dec 201148
Nov 201126
Oct 201129
Sep 201120
Aug 201116
Jul 201179
Jun 201188
May 201134
Apr 2011117
Mar 201115
Feb 201122
Jan 2011119
Dec 201061
Nov 20106
Oct 20103
Aug 201015
Jul 20101
Jun 201013
Apr 201016
Mar 201029
Feb 201079
Jan 2010162
Dec 2009157
Nov 200951
Sep 20094
Aug 200944
Jun 200956
May 200961
Apr 200956
Mar 2009108
Feb 2009241
Jan 200934