james-mime4j-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Markus Wiederkehr (JIRA)" <mime4j-...@james.apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (MIME4J-137) Rewrite MimeIOException eliminate unecessary MimeException and provide general constructors
Date Thu, 11 Jun 2009 10:33:07 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-137?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12718394#action_12718394
] 

Markus Wiederkehr commented on MIME4J-137:
------------------------------------------

I don't think that MimeException is limited to protocol errors. Besides, what is the "protocol"
here? The format of a MIME message?

Anyway, MimeException was motivated by MIME4J-16. So I think a MimeException can be just about
anything. For example if a ContentHandler fails to save a body part of a message the MimeException
may well be caused by an IOException. Even if nothing is wrong with the message.

> Rewrite MimeIOException eliminate unecessary MimeException and provide general constructors
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MIME4J-137
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-137
>             Project: JAMES Mime4j
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 0.6
>            Reporter: Nathan Beyer
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 0.7
>
>         Attachments: mime4j-137.patch, MimeIOException.patch
>
>
> Rewrite the MimeIOException class to eliminate the hidden construction of a MimeException
and provide a more conventional set of constructors.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message