james-mime4j-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Markus Wiederkehr (JIRA)" <mime4j-...@james.apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (MIME4J-129) Split Up Core Module
Date Sat, 02 May 2009 18:46:30 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-129?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12705317#action_12705317
] 

Markus Wiederkehr commented on MIME4J-129:
------------------------------------------

I think the separation of storage, parser and dom could lead to a clearer design. Probably
that's all there is to it..

Also I still believe that the separation into three modules should be relatively easy. If
the modularization shows that some classes have to go to different packages then that's probably
a good thing.

On the other hand modularization is certainly not a must have for me. So I'm +0 to stick to
the original plan.

> Split Up Core Module
> --------------------
>
>                 Key: MIME4J-129
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-129
>             Project: JAMES Mime4j
>          Issue Type: Task
>    Affects Versions: 0.7
>            Reporter: Robert Burrell Donkin
>             Fix For: 0.7
>
>
> ATM only example and benchmark code has been moved into separate modules. The core module
contains all substantial code.
> IIRC the plan was that core would be completely replaced by a number of separate modules.
This task has been created to track this work.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message