james-mime4j-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Robert Burrell Donkin (JIRA)" <mime4j-...@james.apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (MIME4J-129) Split Up Core Module
Date Thu, 30 Apr 2009 12:16:30 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-129?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12704606#action_12704606
] 

Robert Burrell Donkin commented on MIME4J-129:
----------------------------------------------

I think creating an independent module based on org.apache.james.mime4j.storage needs more
thought

This package is coupled to org.apache.james.mime4j.util (plus a utility method in CodecUtil
which would probably be better moved into util)

dom -> storage -> | parser
   |------------------- > |

or (with an independent util module)

dom -> storage --> | util
 |-------> parser ---> |

or (just splitting parser from dom)

dom -> parser

I think it would be useful to have a little bit of a think about what is gained from modularisation



> Split Up Core Module
> --------------------
>
>                 Key: MIME4J-129
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-129
>             Project: JAMES Mime4j
>          Issue Type: Task
>    Affects Versions: 0.7
>            Reporter: Robert Burrell Donkin
>             Fix For: 0.7
>
>
> ATM only example and benchmark code has been moved into separate modules. The core module
contains all substantial code.
> IIRC the plan was that core would be completely replaced by a number of separate modules.
This task has been created to track this work.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message