james-mime4j-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Markus Wiederkehr <markus.wiederk...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: mime4j and OSGi
Date Mon, 16 Mar 2009 16:24:08 GMT
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Wim Jongman <wim.jongman@gmail.com> wrote:
> <snip>
>
> Not related to mime4j there should be a new naming convention providing for
> three levels of package visibility.
>
>   1. API,  dom.organization.soandso
>   2. Not intended to be API dom.organization.internal.soandso
>   3. Absolutely not API dom.organization.private.soandso

Okay, then I'd say the o.a.j.mime4j.field.*.parser packages should
definitely be private.

Candidates for internal would be:
 * org.apache.james.mime4j.codec
 * org.apache.james.mime4j.io
 * org.apache.james.mime4j.util

Maybe o.a.j.mime4j.io should even be private, I'm not sure.

Everything else is public IMO..

Markus

Mime
View raw message