james-mime4j-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Robert Burrell Donkin <robertburrelldon...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Remaining open issues
Date Fri, 06 Feb 2009 22:23:37 GMT
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 9:27 PM, Markus Wiederkehr
<markus.wiederkehr@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 10:08 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
> <robertburrelldonkin@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 10:48 PM, Oleg Kalnichevski <olegk@apache.org> wrote:
>>> Markus Wiederkehr wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 11:44 PM, Markus Wiederkehr
>>>> <markus.wiederkehr@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Here's a list of the remaining open issues:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-34
>>>>>  not sure if this one has not already been resolved; please read my
>>>>> latest comment
>>>>>
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-58
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-68
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-69
>>>>>  target for 0.7?
>>>>
>>>> I have re-targeted these for 0.7..
>>>>
>>>> Markus
>>>>
>>>
>>> As soon as there is some kind of a decision about MIME4J-34 I'll start
>>> preparing the release packages.
>>
>> if you're happy with my resolution, then the issue can be closed
>
> +1
>
> I think you've made a good point with #112. I also believe that
> perfect reproduction of a message would be a necessity if a Mime4j DOM
> should ever be used for verifying an S/MIME signature..

it's not as simple as that: SMIME (and OpenPGP/MIME) require
canonicalisation and normalisation

but i agree that this would be a very useful test of the API

> Regarding 0.6 I think we can build a release candidate now..

once the issue has been closed, +1

- robert

Mime
View raw message