Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-taglibs-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 24699 invoked from network); 27 Oct 2008 16:45:04 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Oct 2008 16:45:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 29929 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2008 16:45:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-taglibs-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 29913 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2008 16:45:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact taglibs-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Tag Libraries Developers List" Reply-To: "Tag Libraries Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list taglibs-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 29902 invoked by uid 99); 27 Oct 2008 16:45:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Oct 2008 09:45:08 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of echofloripa.yell@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.18 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.18] (HELO mail-gx0-f18.google.com) (209.85.217.18) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Oct 2008 16:43:52 +0000 Received: by gxk11 with SMTP id 11so286397gxk.13 for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2008 09:44:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=Qp04triMXofKPWPXE8DPWchgs/3wrP+TB6/uWnt5Dkg=; b=LZ33R1zpRzAaSEto5b50CgvPo/wDYgw/PcOwCsBTbJ3wv51s2zVHw9/xyZRl4bxtpr bZbyMl0erg3asnYn3YMziC442I8f5OnKmi+2Xehb33WK9FlALmmDUcg4LbIP2qiMVlG0 /Mu3pfS7C0vMnjd8YudXrcE1P1DwCWSxi6hEc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=ZOOaUIAfxJr8kXrcioqqxD1SOq4TWhxHPpmqCOVnwZ8zztZ2IvX0WUxO5j4pNDQi1k +o0Yveau1Z2atOWpWGYmiyFSXx2ung6YYhoV45h1ZfafvKKFjtafyqSpHknFfvMekQCM V6bTWbA5gC08fCH6e/V7MLzzAoJ69T5tRKeUw= Received: by 10.90.83.18 with SMTP id g18mr4868288agb.39.1225125854936; Mon, 27 Oct 2008 09:44:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.97.3 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Oct 2008 09:44:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <806d3a1f0810270944x2285b276l8bf775096d6b36b9@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 16:44:14 +0000 From: "emerson cargnin" To: "Tag Libraries Developers List" Subject: Re: Slowly x:forEach/x:out tags In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <806d3a1f0810211109y7743826el690e43a777fae1bf@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org So there is no plans to fix this is future versions? We have quite a few number of x:forEach/x:out on our JSPs. I believe our managers wouldn't be willing to refactor all the pages to switch that for xslt, which I'd believe would be overkill. Is there someone in charge of the x taglibs? regards Emerson 2008/10/22 Kris Schneider : > I don't believe there's an impending fix for Standard 1.1.x, although > the bug report (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27717) > does contain some potential approaches. One of the things I mentioned > in the first comment of the bug report is to try using XSLT as an > alternative: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/taglibs-user@jakarta.apache.org/msg06341.html > > On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 2:09 PM, emerson cargnin > wrote: >> I'm using tomcat 5.5.26 and JDK 1.5. >> After we upgraded standard and jstl version to 1.1.2, the pages >> started to take more than 30 seconds to render. >> >> In this discussion: http://marc.info/?l=taglibs-dev&m=119820558711402&w=2 >> they have the same problem, the context is the same and they end up >> finding that the problem is on the implementation of x:forEach and >> x:out. >> >> We reverted to 1.0.6 versions of those jars, but this is a temporary >> fix, as we want to be able to use features from the new >> especifications. Reverting fixed the problem. >> Does anyone know if there is a plan to fix this libraries? Or should I >> ask this somewhere else? Then please just tell me. >> >> regards >> Emerson > > -- > Kris Schneider > directThought > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: taglibs-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: taglibs-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: taglibs-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: taglibs-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org