Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-taglibs-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 79821 invoked from network); 9 May 2005 18:04:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 May 2005 18:04:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 94010 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2005 18:05:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-taglibs-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 93896 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2005 18:05:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact taglibs-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Tag Libraries Developers List" Reply-To: "Tag Libraries Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list taglibs-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 93728 invoked by uid 99); 9 May 2005 18:05:28 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=10.0 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO,HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE,NO_REAL_NAME X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from 82-70-175-210.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk (HELO kissntgrp1.kissint.co.uk) (82.70.175.210) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 May 2005 11:05:28 -0700 In-Reply-To: To: "Tag Libraries Developers List" Subject: RE: New version of Mailer tag MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.0.2CF1 June 9, 2003 Message-ID: From: pete.storey@kisstechnologies.co.uk Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 19:02:01 +0100 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on KISSNTGRP1/Servers/Kiss Technologies(Release 5.0.12 |February 13, 2003) at 09/05/2005 19:02:10, Serialize complete at 09/05/2005 19:02:10 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 00630FD180256FFC_=" X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N --=_alternative 00630FD180256FFC_= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Ah ha yes this will do it though it's a slight prob for us (and probably others) in that it isn't backwards compatible with the mailer v1 tag so you can't just plop it into your current implementations (and we have a lot already existing). Also can't run on Tomcat 4.x which again we (and others) use a lot. One random thought looking at it - why are the attachments a multipart/related part of another part? Doesn't this mean you don't see them if you have a text only (but mime compliant) browser? I would have thought it would be better to have say a "related" tag which puts in multipart/related things such as images for an HTML email, which returns a CID, and then a seperate generic attach tag to do normal attachments in a multipart/mixed format? cheers Pete "Vianen, Jeroen van" 06/05/2005 22:33 Please respond to "Tag Libraries Developers List" To: Tag Libraries Developers List cc: Subject: RE: New version of Mailer tag Hi Rahul, Yeah, you're right. TC 5.0.x is enough. Regards, Jeroen -----Original Message----- From: Rahul P Akolkar [mailto:akolkar@us.ibm.com] Sent: vrijdag 6 mei 2005 23:31 To: Tag Libraries Developers List Subject: RE: New version of Mailer tag Jereon -- TC 5.0.* isn't enough for mailer2? TC 5.5 requires J2SE 5.0 (or the compatibility patch on 1.4), I wonder if thats a typo. -Rahul On 5/6/05, Vianen, Jeroen van wrote: > Hi Pete, > > Have you tried the mailer2 taglib that's in the sandbox? > > http://jakarta.apache.org/taglibs/sandbox/doc/mailer2-doc/intro.html > > It might have solved all your problems already. Please let me know. > > It does require a JSP 2.0 container like Tomcat 5.5.x or Resin 3.x. > > Regards, > > Jeroen > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: taglibs-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: taglibs-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org email protected and scanned by AdvascanTM - keeping email useful - www.advascan.com --=_alternative 00630FD180256FFC_=--