Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-taglibs-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 69046 invoked from network); 19 Dec 2003 20:10:48 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Dec 2003 20:10:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 75840 invoked by uid 500); 19 Dec 2003 20:10:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-taglibs-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 75698 invoked by uid 500); 19 Dec 2003 20:10:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact taglibs-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Tag Libraries Developers List" Reply-To: "Tag Libraries Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list taglibs-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 75685 invoked from network); 19 Dec 2003 20:10:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (64.4.37.188) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Dec 2003 20:10:37 -0000 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Fri, 19 Dec 2003 12:10:42 -0800 Received: from 200.205.44.180 by bay10-dav14.bay10.hotmail.com with DAV; Fri, 19 Dec 2003 20:10:41 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [200.205.44.180] X-Originating-Email: [mister__m@hotmail.com] X-Sender: mister__m@hotmail.com From: "Michael Nascimento Santos" To: "Tag Libraries Developers List" References: <3FE31E10.7040201@lokitech.com> <3FE347E2.7000706@lokitech.com> <3FE34A72.2040509@lokitech.com> <3FE34EB0.9030401@lokitech.com> <3FE35A26.8040002@lokitech.com> Subject: Re: Another bug, spec issue Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 18:16:44 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Dec 2003 20:10:42.0246 (UTC) FILETIME=[2DBA5660:01C3C66C] X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > > I agree with that. Isn't there a maintainance release of a spec or something > > like that in the JCP? If there is, wouldn't it allow a 1.0.1 spec with this > > issue changed (and maybe others)? Does anyone know (I can't read the JCP > > documment right know, but I will do it if nobody answers my question...)? > > My memory is hazy, but I believe the reason there is no JSTL 1.0.1 spec > is because we handed EL to the JSP Expert Group, and we didn't want > competing EL specs coming out. Also, the Integer vs Number coercion > issue and empty on List vs. Collection are more errata than anything else. > > It's a very good question... maybe we should write this up and send to > the JCP Expert group to see if we can't introduce the concept of spec > errata. If 1-) there is already a maintainance release provision in the JCP and 2-) the Expert Group leads find it worthy, it would be possible to actually publish JSTL 1.0.1 and make standard compliant with that version. That would solve the issues and others. What do you think? Michael Nascimento Santos JSR 207 Expert Group Member http://today.java.net/pub/au/80 Sun Certified Programmer for the Java 2 Platform Sun Certified Web Component Developer for J2EE Moderador SouJava - http://www.soujava.org.br --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: taglibs-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: taglibs-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org