Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-taglibs-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 18906 invoked by uid 500); 6 Aug 2001 21:49:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact taglibs-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: taglibs-dev@jakarta.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list taglibs-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 18899 invoked from network); 6 Aug 2001 21:49:29 -0000 Received: from umbongo.flamefew.com (195.13.79.195) by h31.sny.collab.net with SMTP; 6 Aug 2001 21:49:29 -0000 Received: by umbongo.flamefew.com (Postfix, from userid 0) id AC4504E8BB; Mon, 6 Aug 2001 22:57:03 +0100 (BST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by umbongo.flamefew.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E6494E879 for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2001 22:57:03 +0100 (BST) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2001 22:57:03 +0100 (BST) From: bayard@generationjava.com X-Sender: hen@umbongo.flamefew.com To: taglibs-dev@jakarta.apache.org Subject: Re: reviewing new taglib submissions In-Reply-To: <3B6F107B.41999229@sun.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N As I've got a taglib lost in the submission process, I'm more than happy to second this :) Also to repeat a suggestion from before of a webpage containing submissions. Or a running-email. Bay On Mon, 6 Aug 2001, Pierre Delisle wrote: > For example, on July 23, Richard Friedman has submitted > a printing taglib for review. I have not yet seen any comment > on the list on its suitability for jakarta-taglibs.