Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-taglibs-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 66994 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2001 15:28:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact taglibs-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: taglibs-dev@jakarta.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list taglibs-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 66935 invoked by uid 1235); 27 Apr 2001 15:28:35 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 27 Apr 2001 15:28:35 -0000 Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 08:28:35 -0700 (PDT) From: Morgan Delagrange X-Sender: morgand@localhost To: taglibs-dev@jakarta.apache.org, James Strachan Subject: Re: [VOTE] JDBC tag library name change In-Reply-To: <04d501c0cf2e$32e83d60$1b18000a@citria.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: localhost 1.6.2 0/1000/N Good idea, but we already have a tag library in taglibs names 'SQL'. On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, James Strachan wrote: > > > I would like to change the name of the JDBC tag library. JDBC is a > > registered trademark of Sun, and technically it cannot be used within a > > product name. I am: > > > > +1 > > > > for changing the name of the tag library to 'DBTags', but maintaining the > > current packaging. > > Just a suggestion - how about calling them "SQL Tags" then it would match > your style prefix? > > James > > > _________________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com > >