jakarta-taglibs-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Joseph B. Ottinger" <j...@epesh.com>
Subject RE: [VOTE] Ant Taglib Update, Committer, Taglib Documenting, Ja karta Taglib App
Date Wed, 10 Jan 2001 09:19:27 GMT
I'm not a committer or anything, but I like "build" as the name.


On Tue, 9 Jan 2001 mdelagra@us.britannica.com wrote:

> Actually I was going to suggest "build" as the taglib name.  It seems
> like the most accurate synopsis of the tag's functionality.  Especially
> since the tag has such a unique contract, a descriptive name would be
> helpful.
> 
> > -----Original Message----- 
> > From: Scott "M." Stirling [ mailto:sstirling@mediaone.net
> <mailto:sstirling@mediaone.net> ] 
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2001 5:51 PM 
> > To: taglibs-dev@jakarta.apache.org 
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Ant Taglib Update, Committer, Taglib Documenting, 
> > Jakarta Taglib App 
> > 
> > 
> > On 09 Jan 2001 15:33:27 -0600, Glenn Nielsen wrote: 
> > > I'll second the point that the taglib should have a name 
> > different from Ant 
> > > to avoid confusion. 
> > > 
> > > Glenn 
> > 
> > 
> > All right, I read Hans B.'s post on this too.  I like the name Gnat 
> > Taglib.  It's short enough to be a prefix if someone wants to use it, 
> > it's got three of the letters of Ant in it, and it denotes a smaller 
> > insect even than Ant. 
> > 
> > What say ye?  I definitely don't like something as prosaic as "File 
> > taglib," and I don't think there's a single word to sum up 
> > the taglib's 
> > intent.  The closest I can think of is "Build Util Taglib" or 
> > something. 
> > 
> > 
> > Scott Stirling 
> > West Newton, MA 
> > 
> 
> 

-----------------------------------------------------------
Joseph B. Ottinger                           joeo@epesh.com
http://epesh.com/                             IT Consultant


Mime
View raw message