Mailing-List: contact taglibs-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Sender: Mandar.Raje@eng.sun.com
Message-ID: <38E0F190.8E65B16B@pathfinder.eng.sun.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 09:53:20 -0800
From: MANDAR RAJE <mandar@pathfinder.eng.sun.com>
Organization: Sun Microsystems
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rubys@us.ibm.com
CC: taglibs-dev@jakarta.apache.org, Mandar.Raje@eng.sun.com
Subject: Re: Do we really need to check in the jar files?
References: <852568B0.000EF606.00@d54mta04.raleigh.ibm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

rubys@us.ibm.com wrote:
> 
> > Mandar's original set of tags were based on Tomcat 3.0 (and associated
> > stuff).  To make sure he had a sane environment, he checked in the JARS
> he
> > was using at the time.
> 
> Makes sense. The first thing I will try to do is to reproduce his success
> with 3.0.
> 
> > Now that it's an official project, I agree that we shouldn't need to do
> the
> > JARs, but we've got to be unambiguous about what versions of what are
> > required.
> 
> Given the proximity to 3.1, I think it would be confusing to many to
> deliver it this way.  If you can wait a few days, I would like to verify
> that it not only works on 3.1, but also works with Linux and Win32 on both
> JDK 1.1.8 and JDK 1.2.2.  I'll also try the latest CVS and released
> versions of Xalan and Xerces.
> 
> > Please do start to play.  One of the holdups has been some permission
> issues
> > on CVS checkins.  I'd like to make sure that this works before we
> announce.
> 
> I just successfully made a cosmetic change.  Seemed to work OK.
> 
> - Sam Ruby

Hi Sam,

 I was having some cvs troubles with jakarta-taglibs. Now it
seems that something in my directory was corrupted. I am able 
to do checkins now. I have a version that works with Tomcat 3.1
and will check it real soon.

Mandar.