Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact taglibs-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list taglibs-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 40042 invoked from network); 28 Mar 2000 02:07:58 -0000 Received: from mercury.sun.com (192.9.25.1) by locus.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Mar 2000 02:07:58 -0000 Received: from taller.eng.sun.com ([129.144.125.34]) by mercury.Sun.COM (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA02231 for ; Mon, 27 Mar 2000 18:07:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from eng.sun.com (d-ucup02-251-234 [129.144.251.234]) by taller.eng.sun.com (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3/ENSMAIL,v1.7) with ESMTP id SAA03384; Mon, 27 Mar 2000 18:07:57 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <38E013B4.7C6767AA@eng.sun.com> Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2000 18:06:44 -0800 From: "Craig R. McClanahan" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en]C-CCK-MCD {Sony} (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: taglibs-dev@jakarta.apache.org CC: Mandar.Raje@eng.sun.com Subject: Re: Do we really need to check in the jar files? References: <852568B0.000AD72C.00@d54mta04.raleigh.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Mandar's original set of tags were based on Tomcat 3.0 (and associated stuff). To make sure he had a sane environment, he checked in the JARS he was using at the time. Now that it's an official project, I agree that we shouldn't need to do the JARs, but we've got to be unambiguous about what versions of what are required. Please do start to play. One of the holdups has been some permission issues on CVS checkins. I'd like to make sure that this works before we announce. Craig rubys@us.ibm.com wrote: > I don't know if anybody is following this list yet, but do we really need > to check in jar files? > > The ones that are checked in are fairly old.... (December 1999) > > Anybody object to my starting to play...seeing what works, fixing what I > can, adding more stuff? Or should I wait with everyone else? > > - Sam Ruby