Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-oro-user-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 72844 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jul 2001 17:54:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact oro-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: oro-user@jakarta.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list oro-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 72820 invoked from network); 25 Jul 2001 17:54:55 -0000 Message-Id: <200107251754.f6PHsZR07830@yoda.savarese.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.2 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 To: oro-user@jakarta.apache.org Subject: Re: Is there a bug with :alpha:? In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 25 Jul 2001 13:43:47 EDT." <20010725174456.5068146894@lenard.microcelli5.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 13:54:35 -0400 From: "Daniel F. Savarese" X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N In message <20010725174456.5068146894@lenard.microcelli5.com>, Laurent Duperval writes: >I don't know. In the Applet, I tried > >[[:alnum:]] > >With "J" in the entry box and it returns 1 match. If I do the same with >[[:alpha:]] it doesn't work (0 matches). How do locales affect this (if at >all)? Ok, so that's what I get for testing on my local check out. I fixed this problem in the latest development release, but forgot about it. From the CHANGES file: o Added code to Perl5Matcher to handle bytecode generated for [[:alpha:]]. [[:alpha:]] would compile but not be interpreted. This tells me it's time for a 2.0.4 release. daniel