jakarta-jcs-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nuno Sénica <nsen...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Remove dependency for concurrent.jar
Date Thu, 27 Aug 2009 15:17:35 GMT
Hi Jeffrey

Thanks.

I'll try to do it from trunk, I just need to setup the environment and try
to perform these changes..

I'll request some help when I'm stuck eheheh

If you have any extra tip, just let me know :)

Thanks for your support.

On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 16:02, Jeffrey Kesselman <jeffpk@gmail.com> wrote:

> Well i don't know the codebase so Aaron is your better reference there
> BUT...
>
> Since the large majority of Doug's concurrent library got ported as is into
> the JDK, Id start by simply taking his library out of your build path in
> eclipse.  Then follow the errors and everywhere it can't find a reference
> to
> a concurrent utility, use's Eclipse's help to add the proper import.
>
> Id imagine it cant be more then a day or two of very mechanical work...
>
> Alternately, if your a perl type hacker you could try writing a script that
> would look for the string that is doug's package name in the file and
> repalce it with the JDK package.
>
> JK
>
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Nuno Sénica <nsenica@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Jeffrey and Aaron,
> >
> > We are currently evaluating the effort to perform those changes.. If the
> > effort is not that big, I personally, would like to make that change and
> > contribute to the community.
> >
> > I'll need some guideline from where to start, and regarding that I'm
> > relying
> > on you guys :D
> >
> > Which should be the best approach to start this change ?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Nuno
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 15:30, Jeffrey Kesselman <jeffpk@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > The source is available, couldn't you go through it and change the
> > > references yourselves?
> > >
> > > That seems a lot less costly then abandoning the whole library.
> > >
> > > Maybe you could even contribute those changes back to the community...
> > >
> > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 7:02 AM, Nuno Sénica <nsenica@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > At the company where I work for, we have an application which relies
> on
> > > JCS
> > > > and it has proven to be a good solution so far. But now, we were
> > informed
> > > > about legal issues by using concurrent lib and we are being
> instructed
> > to
> > > > change the caching lib.
> > > >
> > > > My question is if there's any plan to use the native concurrent
> instead
> > > of
> > > > the lib that JSC depend on at the moment ? Is so, when it is planned
> to
> > > be
> > > > available ?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks in advance.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Nuno
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > ~~ Microsoft help desk says: reply hazy, ask again later. ~~
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> ~~ Microsoft help desk says: reply hazy, ask again later. ~~
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message