jakarta-jcs-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mike Perham <mper...@us.ibm.com>
Subject Re: source and binaries
Date Thu, 10 Aug 2006 22:46:38 GMT




It doesn't matter what is best.  I'm constrained by our internal rules: if
I can't get the source cooresponding to a release so it can be verified, I
can't use it.  There's no 1.2.7.7 tag.

mike

Aaron Smuts <asmuts@yahoo.com> wrote on 08/10/2006 04:22:58 PM:

> The 1.2.7.7 is the best.  I will cut a 1.2.7.8 tag
> soon, since I've been using it in prod for some time
> now.
>
> We will have an official release in the next few
> weeks, no doubt.
>
> Aaron
>
> --- Mike Perham <mperham@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > We are considering using OJB and in doing so, we
> > would need to pull JCS
> > into our system.
> >
> > It's a little concerning that JCS does not have an
> > official release and has
> > few tags which coorespond to known stable
> > checkpoints in the codebase.
> > There are a few tags here
> > (http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jakarta/jcs/tags/)
> > but there are versions
> > missing, including the most recent patch binaries.
> >
> > So why has JCS never had an official release?
> > Basically I need to need to
> > get stable source and it seems like 1.2.7.3 is the
> > best I can get right
> > now.
> >
> > mike
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: jcs-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: jcs-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message