Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-jcs-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 78670 invoked from network); 12 Sep 2005 01:07:10 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Sep 2005 01:07:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 17597 invoked by uid 500); 12 Sep 2005 01:07:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-jcs-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 17514 invoked by uid 500); 12 Sep 2005 01:07:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact jcs-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "JCS Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list jcs-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 17501 invoked by uid 99); 12 Sep 2005 01:07:09 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 18:07:09 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [203.202.1.123] (HELO barge.anchor.net.au) (203.202.1.123) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 18:07:19 -0700 Received: from [192.168.1.4] (dsl-58-6-32-215.nsw.westnet.com.au [58.6.32.215]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by barge.anchor.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C6521008C for ; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 11:07:05 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4324D4B4.7060209@backstagetech.com.au> Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 11:07:00 +1000 From: Scott Eade User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: JCS Developers List Subject: Re: Official jcs release? References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Smuts, Aaron wrote: >I think we could do a jcs-1.3.0 based on what is in the svn trunk. > >We need to decide if it will be compiled under jdk 1.3 or 1.4. I'd >prefer that we just move to 1.4, otherwise I need to move one package >out of the main source tree and put it in the jdk1.4 extension jar. > > IMO providing builds targeting 1.4 is fine. It is good to keep backwards compatibility with 1.3 if possible, but not strictly necessary to provide 1.3 builds as long as instructions are available for those that need them. Scott -- Scott Eade Backstage Technologies Pty. Ltd. http://www.backstagetech.com.au --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: jcs-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: jcs-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org