Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-general-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 87115 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2001 05:16:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: general@jakarta.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 87099 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2001 05:16:13 -0000 To: general@jakarta.apache.org Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] The Commons References: <3AA859B2.6CD5516A@optonline.net> <3AA86E73.E8E65BF1@optonline.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Gunnar R|nning Date: 09 Mar 2001 06:10:22 +0100 In-Reply-To: "Geir Magnusson Jr."'s message of "Fri, 09 Mar 2001 00:47:31 -0500" Message-ID: Lines: 27 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.65/Emacs 19.34 X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N "Geir Magnusson Jr." writes: > Seriously - I have to admit I do like some regularity to coding style, > especially when we have this 'free' environment in Commons where any > committer can commit anywhere. > > However, I was just indicating my dislike for some of the Sun coding > standards which seemed to be hinted at as useful for Commons. I also don't like some aspects of the Sun coding guideline - but I still think they are reasonable as a _guideline_, but I don't think it would be wise to do yet another discussion on the merits of different coding styles - most differences are pretty cosmetic anyway - IMNSHO. Regularity is nice, but don't modify readable code just to reformat ;-) > > > mine kroner, > > Isn't that something like US$0.11? > Hopefully getting stronger with the Bush adm. and resulting decline of the US economy. god morgen, Gunnar --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@jakarta.apache.org