Return-Path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Mailing-List: contact cactus-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list cactus-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 88097 invoked by uid 99); 20 Sep 2005 10:05:36 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 03:05:36 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=10.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_BY_IP,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [64.233.170.194] (HELO rproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.170.194) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 03:05:44 -0700 Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id c51so271322rne for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 03:05:23 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=o41Joi73bNlTFqpSlslbTb2zf8rvwYAmjPF0BOb3Pe5D+WkYSYrFSsIVw/KAXhSnRdcav4a8QTTKXB7n3zjgNA7oENIlKwORDCPWdpfEnwvfFiYTTCYIG970fIbA5T+E125FlLI7YwcgQBKAODWyXJzw8Exad2l7aujXtza464Y= Received: by 10.11.99.49 with SMTP id w49mr14246cwb; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 03:05:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.11.118.52 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 03:05:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 06:05:23 -0400 From: Mark Lybarger Reply-To: mlybarger@gmail.com To: Cactus Users List Subject: Re: ant integration w/o junit.jar In-Reply-To: <432F8BFF.1070405@gorgaz.ryazan.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_3854_3201407.1127210723706" References: <432F8BFF.1070405@gorgaz.ryazan.ru> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_3854_3201407.1127210723706 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline i've never seen junit distributed with ant. i checked quickly my ant 1.6.5distribution, and don't see junit.jar in there, only an ant-junit.jar. it would be nice to be able to= =20 run cactus w/o having to depend on putting junit.jar into the system=20 classpath, or into the ant-lib folder. some times you just don't have the= =20 flexability. it's a problem in general with the ant optional tasks in that= =20 by default, they're in the ant lib folder and loaded by the main ant=20 classloader. a user can't even define the junit task since the ant=20 classloader has already loaded the junit task. an idea would be if catus would supply it's own junit ant classes under a= =20 different package structure org.apache.optional.ant... or somesuch. then=20 cactus could extend these classes, and a user could run cactus without=20 worries about the target environment (taskdef for cactus wouldn't depend on= =20 adding junit.jar to some system classpath or ant lib folder). just a thought. On 9/20/05, Glushenkov Victor wrote: >=20 >=20 > >i'm just wondering if there's a way to run cactus's ant integration w/o > >putting junit.jar into the ant lib folder? i'd like to keep all cactus > >specific stuff packaged up outside of the target environment.. > > > > > > > It's not about your problem, but since Ant 1.6 jUnit is already in > distribution's lib directory. >=20 > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: cactus-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: cactus-user-help@jakarta.apache.org >=20 > ------=_Part_3854_3201407.1127210723706--