jakarta-cactus-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Vincent Massol" <vmas...@pivolis.com>
Subject RE: Can't have Cactus run on a 2nd Tomcat
Date Thu, 07 Aug 2003 13:39:54 GMT
Hi Marcio,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marcio Marchini [mailto:marcio@bedarra.com]
> Sent: 07 August 2003 15:37
> To: 'Vincent Massol'; 'Cactus Users List'
> Subject: RE: Can't have Cactus run on a 2nd Tomcat
> 
> Hi,
> 
> 	What I ended up doing was to use serverxml="server.xml" like
this:
> 
> 		    <tomcat4x dir="${tomcat.home}"
> 		    	port="${tomcat.cactus.local.port}"
> 		    	serverxml="server.xml"
> 		        todir="${reports.dir.cactus.tomcat}"/>
> 
> 
> 	And the "server.xml"looks like this:
> 
> 
> <Server port="7005" shutdown="SHUTDOWN" debug="0">
>   <Service name="Tomcat-Standalone">
>     <Connector
> className="org.apache.catalina.connector.http.HttpConnector"
>                port="7080" minProcessors="5" maxProcessors="75"
>                acceptCount="10" debug="0"/>
>     <Engine name="Standalone" defaultHost="localhost" debug="0">
>       <Realm className="org.apache.catalina.realm.MemoryRealm" />
>       <Host name="localhost" debug="0" appBase="webapps"
> unpackWARs="true">
>       </Host>
>     </Engine>
>   </Service>
> </Server>
> 
> 
> 	It worked. I guess it is the solution you propose below too.

Yes! Glad you found it and that it works for you :-)

Thanks for writing back
-Vincent

> 
> marcio
> 
> | -----Original Message-----
> | From: Vincent Massol [mailto:vmassol@pivolis.com]
> | Sent: August 7, 2003 4:59 AM
> | To: 'Cactus Users List'
> | Cc: marcio@bedarra.com
> | Subject: RE: Can't have Cactus run on a 2nd Tomcat
> |
> |
> | Hi Marcio,
> |
> | Good point. Strangely you are the only one to report this
> | issue and I'm pretty sure some others are running several
> | instances of Tomcat. What version of Tomcat are you using?
> |
> | Using an offset is a good idea although there is still a risk
> | of clashing with some other port being used.
> |
> | I'll assume you're using the Cactus/Ant integration of
> | 1.5-beta1 and you're using the <cactus> Ant task. If you
> | check the documentation
> | (http://jakarta.apache.org/cactus/integration/ant/task_cactus.html)
> | you'll see that you can provide your own server.xml file. In
> | that file you full customize your configuration and can
> | specify the ports you wish to use.
> |
> | Thanks
> | -Vincent
> |
> | > -----Original Message-----
> | > From: Marcio Marchini [mailto:marcio@bedarra.com]
> | > Sent: 29 July 2003 17:46
> | > To: cactus-user@jakarta.apache.org
> | > Subject: Can't have Cactus run on a 2nd Tomcat
> | >
> | > Hi,
> | >
> | > 	I have Tomcat running, hosting Anthill as a continuous build
> | tool.
> | > It's at port 8080, but I can see it is also listening on ports
8005
> | and
> | > 8009.
> | >
> | > 	When I run my Cactus tests, I'd like to have it launch
> | its own Tomcat
> | > for the tests, so I specify port 3080. Problem is, it is giving
> | an
> | > exception because it wants to install something on port
> | 8005 as well
> | > (which is already used by the 1st Tomcat). Here's the error:
> | >
> | >       [cactus] HttpConnector[3080] Starting background thread
> | >       [cactus] StandardServer.await: create[8005]:
> | java.net.BindException:
> | > Address already in use: JVM_Bind
> | >       [cactus] java.net.BindException: Address already in use:
> | JVM_Bind
> | >       [cactus] 	at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.socketBind(Native
> | Method)
> | >       [cactus] 	at
> | > java.net.PlainSocketImpl.bind(PlainSocketImpl.java:331)
> | >       [cactus] 	at
> | java.net.ServerSocket.bind(ServerSocket.java:309)
> | >       [cactus] 	at
> | java.net.ServerSocket.<init>(ServerSocket.java:183)
> | >       [cactus] 	at
> | >
> |
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardServer.await(StandardServer.java:510)
> | >       [cactus] 	at
> | > org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina.start(Catalina.java:521)
> | >       [cactus] 	at
> | > org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina.execute(Catalina.java:400)
> | >       [cactus] 	at
> | > org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina.process(Catalina.java:180)
> | >       [cactus] 	at
> | sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native
> | > Method)
> | >       [cactus] 	at
> | >
> | sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccess
> | orImpl.jav
> | a:
> | > 39
> | > )
> | >       [cactus] 	at
> | >
> | sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMeth
> | odAccessor
> | Im
> | > pl
> | > .java:25)
> | >       [cactus] 	at
> | java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:324)
> | >       [cactus] 	at
> | > org.apache.catalina.startup.Bootstrap.main(Bootstrap.java:203)
> | >       [cactus] Stopping service Tomcat-Standalone
> | >       [cactus] HttpConnector[3080] Stopping background thread
> | >
> | >
> | >
> | > 	So, is there an easy way to specify the full set of port numbers
> | to
> | > be different ? I mean, what's the point of being able to
> | specify only
> | one
> | > port ? I was expecting them to work in terms of offsets of
> | each other,
> | but
> | > clearly I am wrong.
> | >
> | >
> | > 	Thanks,
> | >
> | > marcio
> | >
> | >
> | >
> |
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> | > To unsubscribe, e-mail: cactus-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> | > For additional commands, e-mail:
cactus-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
> |
> |
> |



Mime
View raw message