Mailing-List: contact cactus-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm
From: "Nicholas Lesiecki" <nick@eblox.com>
To: "Cactus Users List" <cactus-user@jakarta.apache.org>
Subject: RE: Single test class for both local and remote
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 10:38:26 -0700
Message-ID: <NEBBKNBMILAGPPJFJONAIEEIDLAA.nick@eblox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <3E3F0293.4070205@navis.com>

Tim,

You could implement a common method that did your testing, and then call it
from both beginXXX (client-side) and testXXX (server-side). Would that work
for you?

Cheers,
Nick

P.S. You could also control whether a class extended TestCase or
ServletTestCase at compile time using AspectJ. See:

http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/java/library/j-aspectj2/?loc=j

Cheers,
Nicholas Lesiecki
Principal Software Engineer
eBlox, Inc.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tim McNerney [mailto:mcnerney@navis.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 5:00 PM
> To: cactus-user@jakarta.apache.org
> Subject: Single test class for both local and remote
>
>
> I want to build a test which works both locally (on the client side) and
> remotely (on the server side). This is basically testing the local and
> remote interfaces of an EJB. Since much of the code would be the same
> for both, I'd like to keep it in one class. Let's say I'm using
> (extending) a ServletTestCase for the server side test. Is there some
> way for me to tell my test class not to connect to the test on the
> server side but simply run the test locally?
>
> And I'm making any sense?
>
> --Tim
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: cactus-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: cactus-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
>