jakarta-cactus-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Prabodh Goel <prabodhg...@yahoo.com>
Subject RE: Junit vs JUnitDoclet vs Jtest
Date Fri, 08 Nov 2002 09:13:39 GMT

Hi Vincent,

Thanks for the info. I will have look at Mock Objects
before reaching any conclusion

regards,
Prabodh


--- Vincent Massol <vmassol@octo.com> wrote:
> Prabodh,
> 
> I believe JUnitDoclet only generates empty
> skeletons. You still need to
> put the meat (JUnitDoclet is not a testing
> framework). Do you find
> writing this tedious:
> 
> public class TestXXX extends TestCase
> {
>    public testYYY()
>    {
>    }
> }
> 
> (this is with the new JUnit 3.8.1 syntax)
> 
> That said, EasyMock and the Dynamic Mock API both
> generate Mock objects
> at runtime (using Dynamic Proxies). You should
> really have a look at
> www.mockobjects.com or wwww.easymock.org
> 
> -Vincent
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Prabodh Goel [mailto:prabodhgoel@yahoo.com]
> > Sent: 07 November 2002 04:26
> > To: Cactus Users List
> > Subject: RE: Junit vs JUnitDoclet vs Jtest
> > 
> > 
> > Hi Vincent
> > 
> > Thanks for the help. Will Mock Objects be able to
> > generate Test class and methods framework like in
> > JUnitDoclet.
> > Its actually very tedious to write evey single
> test
> > case using JUint and hence I thought of shifting
> to
> > JUnitDoclet (its free too!)
> > 
> > regards,
> > Prabodh
> > --- Vincent Massol <vmassol@octo.com> wrote:
> > > Hi Prabodh,
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Prabodh Goel
> [mailto:prabodhgoel@yahoo.com]
> > > > Sent: 06 November 2002 05:52
> > > > To: Cactus Users List
> > > > Subject: RE: Junit vs JUnitDoclet vs Jtest
> > > >
> > > > Hi Eric,
> > > >
> > > > I am interested in testing only core Java.
> > >
> > > Then you should use Mock Objects. I highly
> recommend
> > > either EasyMock or
> > > the Dynamic Mock API from www.mockobjects.com.
> > >
> > > However, I hope you do realize that when it
> comes to
> > > testing J2EE
> > > applications, testing the code is only half of
> the
> > > job. Testing the
> > > configuration and setup is the other half.
> Cactus
> > > was built to address
> > > this requirement: it tests the code at the
> method
> > > level but in the
> > > context of its configuration/setup to ensure the
> > > application works (and
> > > not that the code works).
> > >
> > > As we progress towards containers containing
> more
> > > services and as
> > > progress towards L4G tools, the cost of building
> an
> > > application is
> > > shifting more and more towards integration (and
> thus
> > > configuration),
> > > i.e. configuration that is not in the code.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > -Vincent
> > >
> > > >
> > > > - Prabodh
> > > >
> > > > --- EPugh@upstate.com wrote:
> > > > > I think it all depends on what kinds of
> testing
> > > you
> > > > > want..  any one test
> > > > > tool won't work..  I use Junit, DbUnit,
> WebTest,
> > > and
> > > > > Cactus, all depending
> > > > > on what parts of my app I am testing...
> > > > >
> > > > > Eric
> > > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Prabodh Goel
> > > [mailto:prabodhgoel@yahoo.com]
> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 11:30 PM
> > > > > To: Cactus Users List
> > > > > Subject: Junit vs JUnitDoclet vs Jtest
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi All
> > > > >
> > > > > I am evaluating which unit testing method I
> > > should
> > > > > use
> > > > > from Quality Engg. perspective.
> > > > >
> > > > > a. Unit test should have 100% code coverage
> > > > > b. I should be able to compile all the unit
> > > tests
> > > > > (given by developers) at module level as
> well as
> > > a
> > > > > whole.
> > > > >
> > > > > I am evaluating JUnit, JUnitDoclet and
> Jtest.
> > > > >
> > > > > Has anyone used all of these ? If yes,
> please
> > > let me
> > > > > know which one will be able satisfy both the
> > > > > conditions
> > > > > Do I need JProbe for code coverage ?
> > > > >
> > > > > TIA
> > > > > prabodh
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> __________________________________________________
> > > > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > > > HotJobs - Search new jobs daily now
> > > > > http://hotjobs.yahoo.com/
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > > >
> > >
> <mailto:cactus-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > > > <mailto:cactus-user-help@jakarta.apache.org>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> __________________________________________________
> > > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > > HotJobs - Search new jobs daily now
> > > > http://hotjobs.yahoo.com/
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:cactus-user-
> > > > unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > <mailto:cactus-user-
> > > > help@jakarta.apache.org>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > >
> <mailto:cactus-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > <mailto:cactus-user-help@jakarta.apache.org>
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > U2 on LAUNCH - Exclusive greatest hits videos
> > http://launch.yahoo.com/u2
> > 
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:cactus-user-
> > unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> <mailto:cactus-user-
> > help@jakarta.apache.org>
> 
> 
> 
=== message truncated ===


__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
U2 on LAUNCH - Exclusive greatest hits videos
http://launch.yahoo.com/u2

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:cactus-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:cactus-user-help@jakarta.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message