Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-cactus-user-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 27074 invoked from network); 31 Oct 2002 17:52:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Oct 2002 17:52:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 1810 invoked by uid 97); 31 Oct 2002 17:53:38 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-cactus-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 1674 invoked by uid 97); 31 Oct 2002 17:53:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cactus-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Cactus Users List" Reply-To: "Cactus Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list cactus-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 1555 invoked by uid 98); 31 Oct 2002 17:53:35 -0000 X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4218 created Aug 14 2002) Message-ID: <7D293226D95ED5118F8500508BCFEAE609998BC0@ex00a.downeysavings.com> From: "Trieu, Danny" To: 'Cactus Users List' Subject: RE: config of struts with cactus Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 09:52:37 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N I will start a different thread and see how everyone think.... Danny Ps. Sorry, I though I was response to the Struts user group.... -----Original Message----- From: Vincent Massol [mailto:vmassol@octo.com] Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 9:38 AM To: 'Cactus Users List' Subject: RE: config of struts with cactus > -----Original Message----- > From: Trieu, Danny [mailto:DTrieu@downeysavings.com] > Sent: 31 October 2002 17:12 > To: 'Cactus Users List' > Subject: RE: config of struts with cactus > > Sorry Vincent, I guess I am asking everyone that using Struts..... I > think It would be nice to have some sort testing framework that bundle > with Struts distribution..... Yes, it would be nice if Struts could bundle both Cactus and StrutsTestCase and make readily available as part of its distribution for Struts users. I think this is a very good suggestion that you should try to sell on the struts mailing list! Thanks -Vincent > > danny > > -----Original Message----- > From: Vincent Massol [mailto:vmassol@octo.com] > Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 8:53 AM > To: 'Cactus Users List' > Subject: RE: config of struts with cactus > > > Hi Danny, > > Are you asking me this question? Or to Manoj? > > Cheers, > -Vincent > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Trieu, Danny [mailto:DTrieu@downeysavings.com] > > Sent: 31 October 2002 16:40 > > To: 'Cactus Users List' > > Subject: RE: config of struts with cactus > > > > Have you try StrustTestCase? It extended from Cactus, and it seem to > be > > very good. > > > > Craig, > > > > Have you consider to have some sort of test framework like > StrutsTestCase > > to > > be > > Part of the Struts distribution? > > > > danny > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Vincent Massol [mailto:vmassol@octo.com] > > Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 8:28 AM > > To: 'Cactus Users List' > > Subject: RE: config of struts with cactus > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Manoj, Mathew [mailto:Manoj.Mathew@principal.com] > > > Sent: 28 October 2002 20:02 > > > To: Cactus Users List > > > Subject: config of struts with cactus > > > > > > > > > Hi > > > Is the Cactus latest ver is compatible with Jakarta struts 1.0 ? > > > > yes and with any version of Struts as it is completely independent of > > struts. > > > > > > > > Mat > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Taylor,Timothy L. [mailto:ttaylor@mitre.org] > > > Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 1:57 PM > > > To: Cactus Users List > > > Subject: Re: Junit Vs Jtest > > > > > > > > > One thing to point out is that JTest can run JUnit tests, so you > loose > > > nothing by starting with JUnit (which is free), and then if you want > > to > > > eventually move to JTest, the time invested in writing JUnit tests > > won't > > > have been wasted. > > > - Tim > > > > > > Larry Tambascio wrote: > > > > > > > You should check out the archive for the JUnit mail list!! Back in > > > > early September there was a great many messages about this very > > > > topic. I won't even attempt to summarize. > > > > > > > > Later, > > > > -Larry > > > > > > > > On Tue, 15 Oct 2002 22:01:08 -0700 (PDT) > > > > Prabodh Goel wrote: > > > > > > > >> > > > >> Hi Guys, > > > >> > > > >> Does anyone know which is better for unit testing Jtest or > > > >> Junit ? and Why ? > > > >> > > > >> regards, > > > >> Prabodh > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> __________________________________________________ > > > >> Do you Yahoo!? > > > >> Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More > > > >> http://faith.yahoo.com > > > >> > > > >> -- > > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > > >> > > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > help@jakarta.apache.org> > > > > > > > > > -- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > help@jakarta.apache.org> > > > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org> > > For additional commands, e-mail: > help@jakarta.apache.org> > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org> > For additional commands, e-mail: help@jakarta.apache.org> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: