Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-cactus-user-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 90170 invoked from network); 31 Oct 2002 17:15:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Oct 2002 17:15:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 28993 invoked by uid 97); 31 Oct 2002 17:16:13 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-cactus-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 28945 invoked by uid 97); 31 Oct 2002 17:16:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cactus-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Cactus Users List" Reply-To: "Cactus Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list cactus-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 28862 invoked by uid 98); 31 Oct 2002 17:16:11 -0000 X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4218 created Aug 14 2002) From: "Vincent Massol" To: "'Cactus Users List'" Subject: RE: config of struts with cactus Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 17:14:29 -0000 Organization: OCTO Technology Message-ID: <00ec01c28100$f9137420$0200a8c0@octovma> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4024 Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > -----Original Message----- > From: Manoj, Mathew [mailto:Manoj.Mathew@principal.com] > Sent: 31 October 2002 17:07 > To: Cactus Users List > Subject: RE: config of struts with cactus > > Actually i am trying to set up a development env with Struts1.0,Vaj4.0 and > cactus. > I got an error.It was as a result of the fact that the package > org.apache.commons.cactus had been changed to org.apache.cactus in the > revision made from version 1.1 to version 1.2. > So i tried with struts1.1 and it worked well. > Hope i explained it > thanks folks ah ok. Yep. I would strongly suggest to upgrade to Cactus 1.4.1 :-) Thanks for posting back -Vincent > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Vincent Massol [mailto:vmassol@octo.com] > Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 10:41 AM > To: 'Cactus Users List' > Subject: RE: config of struts with cactus > > > Manoj, > > I don't understand. Cactus offers features to provide *container* > objects to your test case. If there's an incompatibility it will be with > some container not following the Servlet/JSP/Filter spec (or Cactus > having a bug and doing something forbidden by the spec). Nothing to do > with Struts, which is also using the Servlet API. Are you saying that > Struts 1.0 was doing something forbidden WRT the Servlet API? > > -Vincent > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Manoj, Mathew [mailto:Manoj.Mathew@principal.com] > > Sent: 31 October 2002 16:35 > > To: Cactus Users List > > Subject: RE: config of struts with cactus > > > > I am sorry.Actually struts1.0 is not compatible with cactus1.4.Not the > > other way around.The problem is with struts > > thanks > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Vincent Massol [mailto:vmassol@octo.com] > > Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 10:28 AM > > To: 'Cactus Users List' > > Subject: RE: config of struts with cactus > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Manoj, Mathew [mailto:Manoj.Mathew@principal.com] > > > Sent: 28 October 2002 20:02 > > > To: Cactus Users List > > > Subject: config of struts with cactus > > > > > > > > > Hi > > > Is the Cactus latest ver is compatible with Jakarta struts 1.0 ? > > > > yes and with any version of Struts as it is completely independent of > > struts. > > > > > > > > Mat > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Taylor,Timothy L. [mailto:ttaylor@mitre.org] > > > Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 1:57 PM > > > To: Cactus Users List > > > Subject: Re: Junit Vs Jtest > > > > > > > > > One thing to point out is that JTest can run JUnit tests, so you > loose > > > nothing by starting with JUnit (which is free), and then if you want > > to > > > eventually move to JTest, the time invested in writing JUnit tests > > won't > > > have been wasted. > > > - Tim > > > > > > Larry Tambascio wrote: > > > > > > > You should check out the archive for the JUnit mail list!! Back in > > > > early September there was a great many messages about this very > > > > topic. I won't even attempt to summarize. > > > > > > > > Later, > > > > -Larry > > > > > > > > On Tue, 15 Oct 2002 22:01:08 -0700 (PDT) > > > > Prabodh Goel wrote: > > > > > > > >> > > > >> Hi Guys, > > > >> > > > >> Does anyone know which is better for unit testing > > > >> Jtest or Junit ? and Why ? > > > >> > > > >> regards, > > > >> Prabodh > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> __________________________________________________ > > > >> Do you Yahoo!? > > > >> Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More > > > >> http://faith.yahoo.com > > > >> > > > >> -- > > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > > >> > > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > help@jakarta.apache.org> > > > > > > > > > -- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > help@jakarta.apache.org> > > > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org> > > For additional commands, e-mail: > help@jakarta.apache.org> > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org> > > For additional commands, e-mail: > help@jakarta.apache.org> > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org> > For additional commands, e-mail: help@jakarta.apache.org> > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org> > For additional commands, e-mail: help@jakarta.apache.org> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: