Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-cactus-user-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 2585 invoked from network); 8 Aug 2002 13:14:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Aug 2002 13:14:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 9208 invoked by uid 97); 8 Aug 2002 13:14:52 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-cactus-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 9178 invoked by uid 97); 8 Aug 2002 13:14:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cactus-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Cactus Users List" Reply-To: "Cactus Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list cactus-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 9166 invoked by uid 98); 8 Aug 2002 13:14:51 -0000 X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4198 created Apr 24 2002) Message-ID: <2BE4F32E01B1D411AC93000629133C7F017783FD@MAIL01-BR2> From: Gustavo Hexsel To: 'Cactus Users List' Subject: RE: RE : CMR testing Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 10:14:54 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2655.55) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Then you mean to use reflection inside a generic session bean to wrap the test calls? Or to make a different entity to each test case? = In the last case, I hope you mean to use a code generator, because it=B4s a = lot of work to write bean, home, remote, ejb and proprietary files for each = test case. Any other ideas? []s Quartz -----Original Message----- From: Michael Mattox [mailto:michael@idtect.com] Sent: quinta-feira, 8 de agosto de 2002 04:09 To: 'Cactus Users List' Subject: RE : CMR testing We just started discussing this, and it's interesting because you = arrive at the same conclusions but by a different path. In other words, = you've given another reason why we need this feature. The idea is to have an EJBRedirector that will test your entities, much like the servlet redirector tests session beans. This would improve the design by removing the servlet from the picture when testing entities. We're hoping someone will volunteer to do it. If not I'm considering it. I'm currently evaluating EJB Entity beans vs. JDO for a new = project and I am not sure I'll be using entity beans (so far I prefer JDO). Michael -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: