Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-cactus-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 71588 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2003 10:14:43 -0000 Received: from exchange.sun.com (192.18.33.10) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jul 2003 10:14:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 1462 invoked by uid 97); 6 Jul 2003 10:17:23 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-cactus-dev@nagoya.betaversion.org Received: (qmail 1455 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2003 10:17:23 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by nagoya.betaversion.org with SMTP; 6 Jul 2003 10:17:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 71507 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2003 10:14:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cactus-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Cactus Developers List" Reply-To: "Cactus Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list cactus-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 71496 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2003 10:14:42 -0000 Received: from mail.gmx.net (213.165.64.20) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jul 2003 10:14:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 13403 invoked by uid 65534); 6 Jul 2003 10:14:55 -0000 Received: from pD958D293.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO gmx.de) (217.88.210.147) by mail.gmx.net (mp001) with SMTP; 06 Jul 2003 12:14:55 +0200 Message-ID: <3F07F6A0.2030203@gmx.de> Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2003 12:14:56 +0200 From: Christopher Lenz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 X-Accept-Language: de-de, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Cactus Developers List Subject: Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - jakarta-cactus-framework-12 References: <00b601c3439d$8b0dcdd0$7ef584c3@vma> In-Reply-To: <00b601c3439d$8b0dcdd0$7ef584c3@vma> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Vincent Massol wrote: > The HttpClient project has just started working on a new version and > they are removing deprecated methods, introducing new ones, etc. > > I guess we need to follow up. It would be nice that we carefully pick > the new API so that we still remain compatible with HttpUnit 2.0. > > Ideas? Comments? Suggestions? > > Thanks > -Vincent Well, they obviously removed a method that was not actually deprecated (it probably should have been, though). We don't get any deprecation warnings when compiling against beta2, so I think that is the only problem. I'll look into replacing the offending code later today, if you don't beat me to it ;-) -- Christopher Lenz /=/ cmlenz at gmx.de --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: cactus-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: cactus-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org