jakarta-bsf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Rony G. Flatscher (Apache)" <r...@apache.org>
Subject Re: A little remark ad "compatibility" of BSF3 ... (Re: svn commit: r757581 - in /jakarta/bsf/trunk/bsf3: ./ testing/jruby-1.1.2/ testing/jruby-1.1.2/src/test/java/org/apache/bsf/testing/javascript/ testing/jruby-1.2.0/ testing/jruby-1.2.0/src/test/j
Date Tue, 24 Mar 2009 13:49:25 GMT

sebb wrote:
> On 24/03/2009, ant elder <ant.elder@gmail.com> wrote:
>>  That sentence is a direct copy from an email when this was discussed a
>>  while back [1], though I agree it could sound better. How about
>>  changing "is not a compatible implementation" to "can not claim to be
>>  a compatible implementation", so:
>>  "Apache BSF 3 is an implementation of JSR-223, the Scripting for the
>>  Java Platform APIs. Note that this software hasn't been tested with
>>  the JSR 223 TCK, and therefore can not claim to be a compatible
>>  implementation of JSR-223."
> Seems good to me, though I think it could go further.

> Is it a complete implementation, i.e. are all aspects of the API implemented?
AFAIK: yes.
> Are there tests for all aspects of the API, including edge-cases?
Not sure.
> If the TCK were used, are the developers confident would it pass?
AFAIK: yes. (Sanka, Nanka could you comment?)


  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message