jakarta-bsf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "ant elder" <ant.el...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: updating the WWW-site
Date Thu, 22 Nov 2007 08:51:02 GMT
On Nov 22, 2007 5:12 AM, Stefan Bodewig <bodewig@apache.org> wrote:

> On Wed, 21 Nov 2007, Rony G. Flatscher <Rony.Flatscher@wu-wien.ac.at>
> wrote:
> >> I haven't worked on the jakarta site myself in a long time, but I
> >> think you really only need to add back the four removed lines and
> >> regenerate the docs.
> >>
> > The problem has arisen by the
> > "http://jakarta.apache.org/site/downloads/downloads_bsf.cgi" script
> > that seems to get automatically generated when the Jakarta site is
> > refreshed (some Python script on a mirror).
>
> No.
>
> The Python script parses the HTML file generated by the XML file I
> cited in my previous mail[1].  The reason you don't see any links to
> the 2.4 release from the download page anymore is that you (Ant) have
> removed them.
>
> Re-add them and the 2.4 links will show up again.
>
> > The only choice on the "download_bsf.cgi" page is the beta2 of BSF
> > 3.0, leading to one of the mirrors for downloading, but the
> > BSF3-beta2 package is not available from any of those mirrors that
> > get used.
>
> This is a different issue.  Where have you put your release files on
> people.apache.org?
>
> Releases should be in /www/www.apache.org/dist/... since this is where
> the mirrors pick them up.  Looking into
> <http://www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/bsf/> I don't see them and looking
> at the local file system on minotaur (the machine behind our websites)
> I can't find them either.
>
> Stefan
>
> Footnotes:
> [1]
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/jakarta/site/xdocs/downloads/downloads.xml?r1=592763&r2=594166
>
>
If we just return to the 2.4 status quo then the 3.0 releases will never get
announced, so unless someone feels particularly strongly about it i'd rather
leave it broken like this as at least then it prompts everyone to help try
to get 3.0 published properly.

>From [1] and [2] either there's a permissions problem or we're trying to put
things in the wrong place. Stefan, as you sound like you know a bit about
this could you give any pointers on this?

   ...ant

[1]
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/jakarta-bsf-dev/200711.mbox/%3c71e1b5740711120725me27b81cv4ee64c55d0b7798d@mail.gmail.com%3e
[2]
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/jakarta-bsf-dev/200711.mbox/%3c47392EA6.8080402@wu-wien.ac.at%3e

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message