Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-bsf-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 11997 invoked from network); 8 Sep 2006 04:38:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Sep 2006 04:38:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 40236 invoked by uid 500); 8 Sep 2006 04:38:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-bsf-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 40201 invoked by uid 500); 8 Sep 2006 04:38:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact bsf-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Bean Scripting Framework developers" Reply-To: "Bean Scripting Framework developers" Delivered-To: mailing list bsf-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 40161 invoked by uid 99); 8 Sep 2006 04:38:22 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Sep 2006 21:38:22 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [209.237.227.194] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (209.237.227.194) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 07 Sep 2006 21:38:21 -0700 Received: (qmail 11945 invoked from network); 8 Sep 2006 04:38:00 -0000 Received: from localhost.hyperreal.org (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (127.0.0.1) by localhost.hyperreal.org with SMTP; 8 Sep 2006 04:38:00 -0000 Message-ID: <4500F38F.6010100@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2006 04:37:35 +0000 From: Sanka Samaranayke User-Agent: Mail/News 1.5 (X11/20060223) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bean Scripting Framework developers Subject: Re: Suggesting a version number of "2.5" for the RC version ... References: <44FFDDB5.1050702@wu-wien.ac.at> In-Reply-To: <44FFDDB5.1050702@wu-wien.ac.at> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: localhost.hyperreal.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 +1 for using a distinct new version number for the RC. Is there any particular reason to select 2.5 instead of 2.4 ? ( .. just curious ..) Best, Sanka Rony G. Flatscher wrote: > Hi there, > > as the present BSF got a few (functional) changes compared to > "2.3.0" I would suggest to use a distinct new version number for > this RC, such that others employing "2.3.0" in their projects are > alerted of this version being newer (although fully backwardly > compatible). > > What do you think? > > Regards, > > ---rony > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: bsf-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: bsf-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org > > - -- Sanka Samaranayake WSO2 Inc. T:+94-77-3506382 F:+94-11-2424304 http://sankas.blogspot.com/ http://www.wso2.net/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFAPOO/Hd0ETKdgNIRAgCjAJ0RWu6HlzymEsEEthSYr+WeVxlywQCfdP41 RZqIFXceIVwpwgWHHDAB4oU= =+Sfg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: bsf-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: bsf-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org