Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact bsf-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list bsf-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 32451 invoked from network); 16 Jun 2003 16:48:06 -0000 Received: from igw2.watson.ibm.com (129.34.20.6) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Jun 2003 16:48:06 -0000 Received: from sp1n293en1.watson.ibm.com (sp1n293en1.watson.ibm.com [9.2.112.57]) by igw2.watson.ibm.com (8.11.7/8.11.4) with ESMTP id h5GGlh1208304 for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 12:47:43 -0400 Received: from lankabook2 (sig-9-65-111-220.mts.ibm.com [9.65.111.220]) by sp1n293en1.watson.ibm.com (8.11.7/8.11.7) with SMTP id h5GGm6j133046 for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 12:48:06 -0400 Message-ID: <0af501c33427$1e34c6d0$72545ecb@lankabook2> From: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" To: "Bean Scripting Framework developers" References: <3EEDF356.5010704@wstoddard.com> Subject: Re: Using BSF to implement JSP language attribute (was: re-organizing the BSF source tree) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 22:48:26 +0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N "Bill Stoddard" writes: > I welcome some good hearty discussion on this topic. Chuck and Victor > have convinced me that BSF is just not the right solution for script > enabling JSP's but they might be making some faulty assumptions. I would like to learn why its not the right way too .. I don't see how one could impl it generally without something like BSF. Matt Duftler first integrated BSF to the WebSphere JSP compiler in March '99 in about 4 hours .. we even had XSLT integrated. It worked pretty fine. Of course performance was not anywhere close to Java and there was no debug story, but it definitely worked fine. Chuck/Victor? Sanjiva.