jakarta-bcel-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From solarwind <x.solarwin...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: is BCEL a good choice?
Date Tue, 01 Jan 2008 01:47:07 GMT
Yeah, but it's much more complex to use in my opinion. BCEL is very easy to
use.

On Dec 31, 2007 8:36 PM, Dave Brosius <dbrosius@apache.org> wrote:

> ASM is probably a better choice for new projects, as it is much more
> actively developed/supported.
>
> asm.objectweb.org
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "uprime uprime812" <uprime812@gmail.com>
> To: "BCEL Users List" <bcel-user@jakarta.apache.org>
> Sent: Monday, December 31, 2007 8:19 AM
> Subject: is BCEL a good choice?
>
>
> > Hello again,
> >
> > I'm working on a commercial tool where I have to build some byte code
> > modification capability. I
> > need a byte code engineering library with features like:
> >
> >   * offer a reasonable set of utilities
> >   * not buggy
> >   * allows byte code to be manipulated abstractly
> >   * free, even for commercial use :) (me being a poor starting
> > enterpreneur
> > :)
> >
> > Is BCEL a good choice? Or does someone has other suggestions?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > W.P.
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: bcel-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: bcel-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>


-- 
..::[ solarwind ]::..
http://www.ubuntu.com/

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message