jakarta-bcel-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "uprime uprime812" <uprime...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: is BCEL a good choice?
Date Tue, 01 Jan 2008 11:14:21 GMT
Ah, ok. That's a lot for the input Erik!  --WP

On 12/31/07, Erik Bengtson <erik@jpox.org> wrote:
>
> I've been using BCEL for several years. It's certainly not buggy and the
> API
> is very simple. BCEL source code is also very easy to understand, so you
> can
> easily create patches.
>
> However there is not a lot of activity in the project to support newer
> java
> spec versions. I've tried up to JDK 1.5 features and BCEL works pretty
> well.
>
> ASM is a good alternative if you need a faster byte code manipulation
> tool.
>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De: uprime uprime812 [mailto:uprime812@gmail.com]
> Envoyé: lundi 31 décembre 2007 14:19
> À: BCEL Users List
> Objet: is BCEL a good choice?
>
> Hello again,
>
> I'm working on a commercial tool where I have to build some byte code
> modification capability. I
> need a byte code engineering library with features like:
>
>    * offer a reasonable set of utilities
>    * not buggy
>    * allows byte code to be manipulated abstractly
>    * free, even for commercial use :) (me being a poor starting
> enterpreneur
> :)
>
> Is BCEL a good choice? Or does someone has other suggestions?
>
> Thanks,
>
> W.P.
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: bcel-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: bcel-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message