Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-bcel-user-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 46418 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2002 06:52:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Oct 2002 06:52:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 16637 invoked by uid 97); 2 Oct 2002 06:53:31 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-bcel-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 16551 invoked by uid 97); 2 Oct 2002 06:53:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact bcel-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "BCEL Users List" Reply-To: "BCEL Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list bcel-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 16537 invoked by uid 98); 2 Oct 2002 06:53:29 -0000 X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4218 created Aug 14 2002) X-Originating-IP: [62.220.3.130] From: To: "BCEL Users List" Subject: Re: checking Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 8:52:22 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20021002065559.GUZV27460.mailoutvl21@[192.168.139.30]> X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi, > I am not convinced this is not a bug, which is why I would like to know if you > can see any difference. > as always, I'd need a small code example to check this... Cheers Markus -- berlin.de - meine stadt im netz. Jetzt eigene eMail-adresse @berlin.de sichern! http://webmail.berlin.de -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: