Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 40443104B0 for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 06:55:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 1450 invoked by uid 500); 24 Oct 2013 06:55:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 1276 invoked by uid 500); 24 Oct 2013 06:55:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 1224 invoked by uid 99); 24 Oct 2013 06:55:03 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 06:55:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.3 required=5.0 tests=SPF_SOFTFAIL,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: softfail (nike.apache.org: transitioning domain of polisettya@gmail.com does not designate 216.139.250.139 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.139.250.139] (HELO joe.nabble.com) (216.139.250.139) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 06:54:50 +0000 Received: from [192.168.236.139] (helo=joe.nabble.com) by joe.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1VZEo0-000273-SF for users@jackrabbit.apache.org; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 23:54:04 -0700 Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 23:53:49 -0700 (PDT) From: anjan To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org Message-ID: <1382597629815-4659810.post@n4.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <1380255733386-4659597.post@n4.nabble.com> References: <1379677361253-4659561.post@n4.nabble.com> <1380255733386-4659597.post@n4.nabble.com> Subject: Re: Group membership and Privileges MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Angela, sorry for posting on a older thread. But this is related to my original question. In the above case (where "test" user belongs to adminstrators group and also have some granted privileges), whether Jackrabbit returns "jcr:addChildNodes" privilege also if I query for Effective privileges for the user "test"? -- View this message in context: http://jackrabbit.510166.n4.nabble.com/Group-membership-and-Privileges-tp4659561p4659810.html Sent from the Jackrabbit - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.