Mailing-List: contact users-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of justinedelson@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.214.180 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: justinedelson@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <1379602191397-4659556.post@n4.nabble.com>
References: <1379602191397-4659556.post@n4.nabble.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 14:06:57 -0400
Message-ID: 
 <CAOAO1Sh52ZSfT+Z16ArHAr8bWaJjz2tf0g5e=6fK369gt53N6w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Searching by exclusions
From: Justin Edelson <justin@justinedelson.com>
To: users <users@jackrabbit.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8ff1c99e6d19f904e6c06bb1

--e89a8ff1c99e6d19f904e6c06bb1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi,
I think you want
//element(*,nt:file)[@prop:group != '9ef90c86-734a-414e-84c3-64dc6452864c']

You should be using the JCR specification as the point of reference. The
fact that Lucene is used is an implementation detail.

Regards,
Justin


On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 10:49 AM, hsp <piccinatto@ibest.com.br> wrote:

> I need to search for nodes that does not have a certain uuid value into a
> multi-value property (or is empty).
> I tried to do a expression like:
>
> //element(*,nt:file)[ jcr:contains(@prop:group, '*   !
> 9ef90c86\-734a\-414e\-84c3\-64dc6452864c') ]
>
> in a hope to get all nodes with that property with different values that
> 9ef90c86\-734a\-414e\-84c3\-64dc6452864c.
> In the http://lucene.apache.org/core/2_9_4/queryparsersyntax.html
> ...
> The NOT operator excludes documents that contain the term after NOT. This
> is
> equivalent to a difference using sets. The symbol ! can be used in place of
> the word NOT.
>
> To search for documents that contain "jakarta apache" but not "Apache
> Lucene" use the query:
>
> "jakarta apache" NOT "Apache Lucene"
>
> Note: The NOT operator cannot be used with just one term. For example, the
> following search will return no results:
>
> NOT "jakarta apache"
> ...
>
> that's why I started the terms with a "*" term, don't know the side
> effects...
>
> Any help will be appreciated,
> Helio.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://jackrabbit.510166.n4.nabble.com/Searching-by-exclusions-tp4659556.html
> Sent from the Jackrabbit - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>

--e89a8ff1c99e6d19f904e6c06bb1--